Laserfiche WebLink
CASE NUMBER: 1309'81 1 May 1981 <br />APPLICANT: Sam Cave page 3 <br />single family plat is approved and hoaxes are constructed, the possibility <br />for later conversion is virtually eliminated. <br />7. we suggest, therefore, -that the Planning Commission and council may not <br />grant to make a decision with respect to the current application 6nti l such <br />time as a public Hearing is held on the rezoning to Limited Business for <br />the Fairview frontage which will occur at the next Planning- commlissibn <br />meeting; -It would be us -eful, however,' in our - opinion, if the Planning <br />Commission were. to conduct a constructive inquiry with the effected <br />residents in the Fairview Hills Plat regarding their' desires relating to <br />commercial or single family development., <br />8. If the Planning Commission Chairman so desires, it may be appropriate to <br />announce this change in -plans on the part of Mr. cave at the beginning . o f <br />the hearing, so as -to channel the discussion toward the choice between the <br />single family development versus .the commercial redevelopment concept. <br />9. There may also be opi.ni.onr� offered on the part of single family homeowners <br />to the north (on oakcrest) regarding the projection of the street northerly <br />from the Cave single family , plat through to bakcrest. In this area, the <br />City owns two lots which were purchased for' the 'purpose of ultimately <br />- <br />extending this street northward. The reason for this is that if the land <br />is developed- single family, it will have but a, single access from Bruce <br />Avenue off Fairview.- If the extenslon to oacrest is not made,,-the <br />result will be 35 homes located on a single cul-de-sac loop. This is <br />in conflict with normal public safety standards relating to access for <br />emergency fire, ambulance, and police vehicles. The city staff emphasizes <br />the importance of a second access to this neighborhood for your <br />consideration. <br />