Laserfiche WebLink
Roseville, MN - Official Website <br />Page 9 of 31 <br />Morgan Kempton, 2891 Merrill Street (13 year old daughter —8th <br />grader) <br />Ms. Kempton, daughter of Mr. and Mrs. La Palm, expressed her personal <br />concern regarding potentially opening County Road C -2, particularly her <br />concern for the safety of her brother and sisters and others in the <br />neighborhood. Ms. Kempton commented on her personal review of the traffic <br />study and potential traffic around her home if County Road C -2 were opened; <br />preventing her brother and sisters from playing outside safely; as well as <br />concerns for those walking or walking their dogs in the area. With school <br />starting soon, Ms. Kempton noted that there would be more walkers and more <br />school buses; and if County Road C -2 were opened, she questioned how traffic <br />changes would impact County Road C -2 and how long the construction period <br />would be that would also impact motorized traffic. Ms. Kempton advised that <br />she didn't want to walk around a lot of construction work for a long time. Ms. <br />Kempton advised that she and her family really appreciated their peaceful <br />neighborhood and had many friends in the neighborhood that were like their <br />extended family. Ms. Kempton asked that the City Council consider the <br />viewpoints of someone her age, wanting to make a difference in her <br />community, and believing that County Road C -2 should remain closed. <br />Dennis Dietzel, 2954 Hamline Avenue <br />As an avid biker and pedestrian along both County Road C -2 and Josephine <br />Road, opined that, in all fairness, the perception that this was a broader <br />community issue didn't necessarily ring true. While appreciating both routes <br />for walking, and the amenity of County Road C -2's quiet access into the <br />neighborhood around Griggs and Merrill, Mr. Dietzel opined that the <br />neighborhood would be significantly changed if County Road C -2 was opened, <br />and that it would impact the neighborhood negatively. Mr. Dietzel further <br />opined that he didn't feel limited in his options for east /west access through <br />the community; and asked that, if opening County Road C -2 was the decision <br />of the City Council, that they give serious consideration to safely <br />accommodating bicycles and pedestrians in that area. <br />Mr. Yi He, 1144 County Road C -2 (just east of Lexington) — <br />developer /manager of online petition <br />Mr. He expressed his pride in living in a great and diverse neighborhood; and <br />the continuing sense of neighborhood in resolving this issue. Mr. He reviewed <br />the actual 137 signatures of the e- petition representing 80 households either <br />on or across the street from lakes; with 60% outside the neighborhood. Mr. <br />He opined that opening County Road C -2 provided a limited and <br />disproportionate benefit for lake front homes. <br />Mr. He addressed the petition with 215 handwritten signatures from 150 <br />households, 97% from the neighborhood and expressing major safety concerns <br />at multiple intersections along County Road C -2, the costly construction to <br />connect County Road C -2 and correct grade issues; and destruction of an <br />established neighborhood, should it be connected. For those advocating <br />connecting County Road C -2, Mr. He questioned if the statistics provided by <br />Ms. Pam Newcome, with 60% outside the neighborhood, took into <br />consideration safety issues, or simply based their responses on convenience. <br />Mr. He addressed several items he didn't think were addressed sufficiently in <br />the traffic study, including turn actions onto roads (Lexington Avenue) with <br />higher speed limits (40 mph) and difficulty with visibility and access from cross <br />streets (left from County Road C -2 onto Lexington and Victoria and County <br />Road C); and steep banks requiring reduced speed. <br />Irene Erickson, 1251 Josephine Road, very new resident (as of <br />Saturday) to Roseville and former Shoreview resident commuting <br />through Roseville <br />http:// www. cityofroseville .com /Archive.aspx ?AMID= &Type= &ADID= 1148 &PREVIE... 10/12/2011 <br />