Laserfiche WebLink
Roseville, MN - Official Website <br />traffic study as referenced. <br />Page 16 of 31 <br />Ms. Bloom advised that the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update for the City of <br />Roseville completed in 2008, provided data projecting 2030 traffic at 2,600 <br />vehicles per day on Josephine Road. At the request of the community, and as <br />authorized by the City Council, an update was sought from this most recent <br />traffic study and answered on page 16 of the study. Ms. Bloom noted that the <br />traffic model used is from 2010, and that the regional demand model had <br />updated numbers. Ms. Bloom clarified that traffic is not proportional; and that <br />the most recent information from the Metropolitan Council was used (new <br />regional traffic model). Ms. Bloom noted that the change was not changed <br />equivalently; but Josephine Road was less than projected. Ms. Bloom advised <br />that this was a common finding, and had been experienced on Rice Street as <br />well. Ms. Bloom noted that traffic modeling is a projecting using the best <br />information available, the nature of forecasting. <br />Mayor Roe asked Ms. Bloom to address whether the City of Roseville was <br />following established rules for MSA roads. <br />Ms. Bloom advised that one of the unique parts of the MSA rules and system is <br />that non - existing routes could be designated as MSA roadways. Ms. Bloom <br />noted that County Road C -2 was a state aid route from Snelling Avenue to <br />Victoria Street; even though a portion of it was actually non - existing. Ms. <br />Bloom clarified discrepancies in why the road was shown on the Ramsey <br />County GIS system and not on MSA records, noting that there was an existing <br />60' right -of -way between Griggs and the cul -de -sac reserved for public <br />improvements. Ms. Bloom advised that the City was looking at the existing <br />right -of -way from Lexington to Hamline Avenues for additional pathway <br />development as part of the Josephine Woods development project. Ms. Bloom <br />reviewed other non - existent roadway segments that are designated MSA <br />similar to this one, such as a segment of Twin Lakes Parkway. Ms. Bloom <br />advised that it was common practice to draw dollars for those non - existing <br />roads. <br />Mayor Roe asked Ms. Bloom to address the purpose of MSA road designations <br />and funds. <br />Ms. Bloom advised that it was tied to future construction and dedicated funds <br />for county state aid highways (CSAHIs) and MSA funds received through the 30 <br />cent gas tax dollars paid at the pump; with receipt of funds based on <br />population and needs; as well as roadway cycles and annual updates provided <br />to the state by the City. <br />Mayor Roe asked Ms. Bloom to address how a road became MSA designated. <br />Ms. Bloom advised that there were three (3) criteria to be considered for that <br />designation: higher traffic volumes, not only a local road, and other criteria. <br />Ms. Bloom advised that the City recommends roads for MSA designation based <br />on established criteria, and the Commissioner of Transportation confirmed that <br />designation. <br />Mayor Roe questioned if the City could designate portions, but no others. <br />Ms. Bloom responded affirmatively, as long as they met the criteria. <br />At the request of Councilmember Pust, Ms. Bloom advised that funds would be <br />paid back if deemed applicable, or a portion thereof. <br />Councilmember Willmus questioned if there were currently utilities running <br />through that area. <br />http:// www. cityofroseville .com /Archive.aspx ?AMID= &Type= &ADID= 1148 &PREVIE... 10/12/2011 <br />