Laserfiche WebLink
Roseville, MN - Official Website <br />Page 19 of 31 <br />continue designating County Road C -2 as an MSA road; and impacts to <br />continuing to do so or not to do so. <br />Ms. Bloom responded that staff would need to research monetary impacts to <br />the City in whether to continue designating it as an MSA road; advising that <br />the portion could be undesignated. Ms. Bloom advised that state aid <br />encouraged removal of non - existing road segments from the state system, and <br />the City could consider doing so; however in the City's overall management of <br />the state aid system, 25% of the City's total road miles could be designated, <br />and sometimes segments of a road were designated as state aid roads. In the <br />City's overall road grid system, Ms. Bloom advised that another segment would <br />need to be identified to maximize the City's piece of the pie, since the City <br />currently had approximately 1.5 miles of undesignated state aid roadway <br />mileage, based on that 25% state allowance. Ms. Bloom noted that the <br />current intent was to hold that undesignated portion in reserve for County <br />Road B west of Cleveland Avenue, which Ramsey County would like to turn <br />back to the City. <br />Mayor Roe questioned if that section of County Road C -2 east of Cleveland <br />Avenue in the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area was designated MSA> <br />Ms. Bloom responded that it was an MSA route in that location; but had been <br />removed to facilitate Langton Lake Park, as well as due to road flooding and <br />other problems, and thus removed from the state aid system. <br />Councilmember McGehee questioned if the road was not vacated, would the <br />City still retain access that could be used for a playground or green area. <br />Ms. Bloom advised that a pathway was proposed as part of the Josephine <br />Woods project; but noted that this was ultimately a City Council policy <br />discussion and decision. <br />Mayor Roe advised that if a right-of-way was designated for future road <br />purposes, it would be inappropriate to put a park on such a right-of-way, since <br />other steps would then need to be taken. <br />Councilmember McGehee opined that using the right -of -way for green space or <br />a park didn't preclude its future use as a road; and the use could be <br />discontinued; and could be used now to enhance the neighborhood rather than <br />underused. <br />In order to address comments he'd heard from the public during the recess, <br />Councilmember Willmus clarified that some citizens were under the impression <br />that the City Council would not be taking action on this issue tonight, and <br />therefore had left the meeting already. <br />Mayor Roe advised that it was not his intent that any action would be taken <br />tonight. <br />As part of her decision - making process, Councilmember Pust requested <br />information from staff on a potential cost to construct this segment of County <br />Road C -2. <br />Mayor Roe questioned the level of detail Councilmember Pust was requesting. <br />Councilmember Pust advised that she was only looking for a range, not such <br />that would be detailed in a Request for Proposals (RFP) type of situation; but if <br />this construction were to come forward as a priority at this time, staff's <br />engineering estimate. <br />Councilmember Johnson opined that staff's recommendation to not vacate the <br />http:// www. cityofroseville .com /Archive.aspx ?AMID= &Type= &ADID= 1148 &PREVIE... 10/12/2011 <br />