My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011_1017_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2011
>
2011_1017_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2012 3:55:34 PM
Creation date
1/9/2012 3:48:54 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment A <br />Pat Trudgeon <br />From: Bill Malinen <br />Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 12:15 PM <br />To: *RVCouncil; Tim O'Neill; Pat Trudgeon <br />Subject: FW: Apartment Fire Sprinklers <br />Done. <br />- - - -- Original Message---- - <br />From: Tam McGehee Lmailto:tam mcgehee.info� <br />Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 9:14 AM <br />To: Bill Malinen <br />Subject: RE: Apartment Fire Sprinklers <br />Bill, <br />To avoid any violation of any obscure laws or ordinances, please forward this e -mail to Pat, <br />Tim, and the City Council and any one else on the original list. <br />Thank you, <br />Tammy <br />Bill, <br />I am well aware of the state law regarding rehabbing of apartment buildings. That does not <br />preclude Roseville from being somewhat proactive. In my opinion, the spending of <br />approximately one million dollars of TIF (which is also taxpayers' money) to "upgrade" an <br />apartment building but fail to require sprinklers as a fire suppression aid is neither good <br />policy or good planning. As we utilized a "development agreement" and taxpayer subsidies, we <br />did have the right to make any requests we so chose. We had an apartment complex in very <br />poor shape that could perhaps have been condemned. What we now have is 120 apartments that <br />are not handicapped accessible or supplied with fire suppression sprinklers. <br />Although this was not done on my watch, <br />rehab were included in the packet or the <br />If we are to move forward, as opposed to <br />that we should take every opportunity to <br />These units received the equivalent of a <br />hazard for the next thirty years. <br />I am curious about whether these limitations on the <br />discussion when this project initially came forward. <br />marking time or moving backward, as a city, it seems <br />upgrade our housing stock to modern standards. <br />facelift and left us with a fundamental safety <br />Perhaps you would like to bring up what is included in our information packets and whether we <br />would like to review our policies with regard to multifamily housing renovations. <br />Tammy <br />-- - - - - -- Original Message -- - - - - -- <br />Subject: Apartment Fire Sprinklers <br />From: Bill Malinen < bill .malinen@ci.roseville.mn.us> <br />Date: Thu, September 29, 2011 8:51 am <br />To: *RVCouncil < city. coupcil@ci.roseville.mn.us> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.