My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_1212
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_1212
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2012 9:01:28 AM
Creation date
1/25/2012 9:01:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
12/12/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,December 12,2011 <br /> Page 10 <br /> Councilmember McGehee seconded those comments of Councilmember Pust; and <br /> advised that she would also be voting against issuance of the bonds; and was fully <br /> supportive of those residents wishing to have a voter referendum. While this is an <br /> excellent interest rate, Councilmember McGehee expressed her disappointment <br /> that the "City Council didn't trust residents enough to have a referendum in No- <br /> vember to avoid this without a call." <br /> Mayor Roe expressed his disappointment that all residents of Roseville didn't <br /> trust the City Council to make good decisions on the bond sale, to their advantage <br /> and benefit, without creating additional interest and legal costs, depending on <br /> whether or not their appeal is successful. Mayor Roe stated that the City Council <br /> was elected to take action, and the majority decision to move forward without a <br /> voter referendum was not based on any lack of trust in residents; but simply based <br /> on the benefit available to the community, and an effort to save everyone money. <br /> Councilmember Johnson concurred 100%with those comments of Mayor Roe. <br /> Councilmember Pust opined that it was not about trusting members of the City <br /> Council; and for those Boy Scouts in the audience, opined that it was about trust- <br /> ing democracy. While there are five people on the City Council, Councilmember <br /> Pust noted that a majority of three passed the motion to issue the bonds; and noted <br /> that this was how democracy worked with majority rule. However, Councilmem- <br /> ber Pust noted that a small group of citizens in Roseville decided to throw a <br /> wrench into the system and not trust that democracy, in addition to costing resi- <br /> dents an additional $300,000 in additional taxes. Councilmember Pust opined <br /> that the issue was simply whether or not people believed in the foundations of <br /> democracy on which the City of Roseville was based. <br /> Pust moved, Willmus seconded a motion to call the question. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Johnson; Willmus; McGehee; Pust; and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> Roll Call <br /> (Original Motion by Johnson) <br /> Ayes: Johnson; Willmus; and Roe. <br /> Nays: McGehee and Pust. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> b. Consider a Resolution for the Final Tax Levy Budget,Debt Levy <br /> Finance Director Miller was available for consultation during these final delibera- <br /> tions of the City Council on the 2012 Budget and Levy. <br /> Mayor Roe confirmed with Mr. Miller that the draft resolutions included in to- <br /> night's agenda packet were based on the preliminary levy set in September, at a <br /> 4%not-to-exceed levy. Mr. Miller further confirmed, with one exception, that the <br /> budget amounts were based on those preliminary numbers as well, other than for <br /> the 2013 budget amended to account for additional costs related to some of the <br /> park improvements scheduled to come on line in 2012 (e.g. shelters with the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.