My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_1212
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_1212
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2012 9:01:28 AM
Creation date
1/25/2012 9:01:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
12/12/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, December 12, 2011 <br /> Page 2 <br /> Pust moved, Johnson seconded, to adjourn the Closed Executive Session and reconvene <br /> in open session. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Johnson; Willmus; McGehee; Pust; and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> Mayor Roe reconvened the City Council at approximately 6:05 p.m. in regular session. <br /> Discuss Litigation Related to 2011 Bond Sale <br /> Mayor Rcie recognized Finance Director Chris Miller to address today's $10,000,000 <br /> General Obligation Bond Sale, Series 2011A; and reiterated that following the presenta- <br /> tion, the City Council would return to Closed Executive Session to discuss litigation <br /> strategies related to this item, if later action under Agenda Item 12.a is successful. <br /> Finance Director Chris Miller noted that by previous City Council action, staff and the <br /> City's bond counsel had been authorized to issue $10,000,000 in General Obligation <br /> Bonds for the purpose of financing construction of a new fire station, and as a portion of <br /> Phase I of park and recreation improvements. Mr. Miller noted the attendance of Ms. <br /> Terri Eaton of Springsted, the City's Financial Consultant to review the results of the <br /> sale; as well as Ms. Mary Ippel, the City's Bond Counsel to review legal portions of the <br /> sale and implications for the City Council to consider moving forward. <br /> Mr. Miller noted distribution of two (2) bench handouts: one consisting of the actual tab- <br /> ulation of bid results from today's bond sale; and the other a revised resolution outlining <br /> the award of sale; with one (1) additional paragraph added at the bottom of page 6 of the <br /> resolution(second paragraph, Section B); both attached hereto and made a part hereof. <br /> Ms. Eaton advised that the Bond Issue had received thirty (30) bidders, based in part on <br /> the City's very favorable AAA Bond Rating by Moody's, and due to the size of the issue <br /> and qualification of the bonds being very appealing to the market, as well as the reputa- <br /> tion of the City of Roseville's financial management. Ms. Eaton advised that the low <br /> bidder was FTN Financial Capital Markets at a rate of 2.1588%, well below the estimated <br /> 2.88% rating estimated several months ago by bond agencies based on the market. Ms. <br /> Eaton advised that this reduced interest rate would result in a savings of approximately <br /> $710,000 less in interest costs that those estimated one month ago. <br /> Ms. Eaton noted that, as the bonds were being opened earlier today, a citizen group had <br /> appealed previous court action; and advised that when an underwriter (e.g. FTN) pur- <br /> chased the bonds, they in turn wanted to resell them immediately, and such a situation <br /> provided them the right to withdraw their bid. In the interest of locking in the 2.15888% <br /> interest rate and the timing for bank qualified bonds based on thirty (30) basis points and <br /> at such low rates, Ms. Eaton advised that throughout the day, City of Roseville and <br /> Springsted staff had reached consensus that there was a strong incentive to see what <br /> could be done to salvage the Bond Sale, recognizing the provision that would allow the <br /> bonds to be callable, which is typically not preferred, but has been known to occur but at <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.