Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING <br />OF CITY COUNCIL <br />CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City <br />Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, was duly held at the City <br />Hall in said City on Monday, the 9th day of January, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. <br />I <br /> <br />The following members were present: Matson, Cushman, Johnson, Kehr, and <br />Rog. <br /> <br />And the following were absent: None. <br /> <br />councilperson Johnson introduced and moved the adoption of the following <br />resolution: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 8396 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF <br />PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF <br />REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT NO. P-ST-SS-W-89-13 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, a certain petition requesting an improvement in the City of <br />Roseville along County Road C-2 west of Lexington approximately 450 feet <br />by the installation of concrete curb and gutter, bituminous paving, <br />drainage, sanitary sewer, water, and necessary appurtenances, filed <br />with the Council on January 9, 1989, is hereby declared to be signed by <br />100% of the owners of property affected thereby pursuant to Minnesota <br />Statues, Sec. 429.035. <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA: <br /> <br />That the petition be referred to the city Public Works Director for <br />study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all <br />convenient speed, advising the Council in a preliminary way as to <br />whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it <br />should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other <br />improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly <br />seconded by Councilmember Cushman and upon vote being taken thereon, the <br />following voted in favor thereof: Matson, Cushman, Johnson, Kehr, and <br />Rog. <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: None. <br /> <br />Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />