Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City <br />Council of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota was duly <br />held on the 27th day of February, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br />The following members were present: Cushman, Kehr, Johnson, Matson, <br />and Rog, and the following were absent: None. <br /> <br />Member Matson introduced the following resolution and moved its <br />adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 8422 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION SUPPORTING MINNESOTA OVAL BONDING REQUEST <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission (MASC) has included <br />the Minnesota Oval as part of the recommended 1989 bonding proposal; <br />and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the construction of the Minnesota Oval would be of <br />significant economic benefit for the State of Minnesota; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Minnesota is recognized as a national leader in winter <br />amateur sports, and the construction of the Minnesota Oval would <br />provide a necessary facility to maintain this recognition; <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the city Council of the City of <br />Roseville: <br /> <br />1. That the City reaffirms its support for the construction of the <br />Minnesota Oval in Roseville. <br /> <br />2. That the city is requesting $5,000,000.00 from the State Capital <br />Bonding Fund towards the $7,237,000.00 estimated construction <br />costs. <br /> <br />BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: <br /> <br />1. That if the Minnesota Oval is not included in the 1989 State <br />Capital Bonding Bill, the city requests the legislature to provide <br />$400,000.00 in planning monies that would allow for the completion <br />of all plans and specifications necessary for the construction of <br />the Minnesota Oval multi-use facility. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly <br />seconded by Member Kehr, and upon a vote being taken thereon, the <br />following voted in favor thereof: Cushman, Kehr, Johnson, Matson, and <br />Rog, and the following voted against the same: None. <br /> <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />