My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-12-20_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
2011-12-20_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2012 10:35:28 AM
Creation date
1/26/2012 10:35:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
12/20/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
advised that these issues were all factored into pricing structures, creating the <br /> variables. <br /> In response, Member Vanderwall noted that Roseville residents experienced <br /> different prices and questioned if that was based on certain geographical <br /> situations. <br /> Mr. Stoltman responded that he couldn't answer that questions; and suggested a <br /> better questions for haulers operating in Roseville would be, if given the <br /> opportunity, they could come back with answers, recognizing that it was a fair <br /> question. Mr. Stoltman noted that differences in the pricing structure would be <br /> the small hauler versus the larger hauler and variables in tipping fees. Mr. <br /> Stoltman advised that his firm provided health, dental, 401K, and other benefits <br /> for their employees; while needing to address ongoing overhead costs, age and <br /> type of equipment; and that all those dynamics are pulled into the mix; requiring a <br /> company to keep innovative with their competition. <br /> At the request of Member Gjerdingen on when haulers could be invited to the <br /> table for further discussion in the process, Chair DeBenedet advised that, once the <br /> City Council received the Commission's recommendation, they would direct staff <br /> to develop a process, as part of the statutory requirement process. <br /> Ayes: 5 <br /> Nays: 0 <br /> Motion carried. <br /> 6. Possible Items for Next Meeting—January 24, 2012 <br /> • Review and potential adoption of a Resolution recommending organized trash <br /> collection to the City Council <br /> • Environmentally Sustainable Presentation <br /> • Overview of upcoming Ramsey County projects (County Road B-2) ; and <br /> based on the potential high cost for driveways and traffic controls for those <br /> projects, <br /> • Review of the City's current Assessment Policies for non-residential <br /> properties <br /> • Prioritization list for Parks Master Plan Implementation <br /> Future Meetings <br /> • Joint meeting of the PWET and Parks and Recreation Commissions <br /> • Pro-active creation of resources or incentives for new businesses to adopt <br /> environmental-friendly development methods (e.g. parking lots being more <br /> pedestrian and bicycle-friendly) as supported by Roseville resident <br /> preferences (Felice) <br /> Member Stenlund suggested a presentation by FOR Consulting Engineers or <br /> another firm regarding minimum impact design standards currently available <br /> as a preliminary presentation; and alternatives available in the Minnesota <br /> Page 15 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.