My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1982_0111_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982
>
1982_0111_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2012 2:00:38 PM
Creation date
1/27/2012 1:56:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PLANNING REPORT <br />CASE 1309 -81 <br />Page 2 <br />should remain and that the remainder of the land should be developed for <br />single family purposes. In that case, there may be some question as to <br />the lot sizes proposed inasmuch as they do not conform to the 85 foot <br />minimum frontage. The lots vary from 70 to loo feet. The normal policy <br />of the City has been to allow lots of less than 85 f eet frontage if it is <br />consistent with the established lot size in 'the area; Mary of the lots <br />in the development are platted with 100 feet of frontage and 100 feet of <br />depth. However, there are some lots in the existing plat on the east side <br />already platted at 75 feet. It will therefore be a matter of judgement as <br />to whether or not the lot size as proposed is reasonable., <br />5. We have also discussed with Mr. Cave the possibility of realigning the <br />stub street to be extended northward into Cakcr es t slightly so as to <br />allow the development of a corner lot on each side of the extended street <br />at the intersection with oakcrest. should the Commission and Council decide <br />the new lots should conform with ordinance standards, a lot plan could be <br />devised conforming to such standards. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.