My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1982_0412_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982
>
1982_0412_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2012 2:21:51 PM
Creation date
1/27/2012 2:19:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FQR COUNCIL ACTION <br />AGENDA SECTION,', ORIGINATING DEPT./DIV.4 <br />Reports & Recommendations Public Works Director <br />ITEM NO - ITEM DESCRIPTION' Petition for Glenhill Road Reconstruction, <br />ST-P-81-11 <br />MEETING 4/12/82 <br />DATE: 0 <br />I-EPT. HEAD APPROVAL. <br />Last August,, the City received a peon signed by 12 of the 13 property <br />owners on Glenhill Road., between Snelling Avenue and Hamline Avenue. You <br />-may recall, that this was a boundary road, with the north half of the street <br />being in Arden Hills, and the south half being in Roseville, <br />At that time, the Council <br />received <br />a petition a-nd authorized the staff to <br />work with Arden Hills in an effort <br />to develop a joint <br />powers agreement for <br />the feasibility study and <br />p-otentially the improvement. <br />Arden Hills has <br />subsequently met with the <br />property <br />owners on its side <br />of the street to <br />review their procedure for- assessing a roadway reconstruction such as this. <br />Unfortunately, since their process <br />is to assess 80 to <br />100% of the cost., th(.- <br />Arden Hills residents now <br />indicate <br />they are no longer <br />interested, <br />Arden Hills has,. therefore, sent us a letter requesting that the proj ect <br />not be undertaken at this time because of the funding problems. Since <br />this is a boundary street., and would logically require both communes <br />to be involved, it is similarly the Public Work's Department position that the <br />[�roject should not be pursued at this time, <br />If the Council concurs in this approach, then the staff will contact <br />ffetitioner to explain the situation, and end our efforts for this <br />improvementO <br />Keicommended Council Action: Adoption of a Resolution terminating project <br />ST-P-81-11, Glenhill Road, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.