Laserfiche WebLink
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING <br /> OF THE <br /> CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * <br /> Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City <br /> of Roseville,County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held on the 23rd day of January, <br /> 2012, at 6:00 p.m. <br /> The following members were present: Pust, Willmus, Johnson, McGehee and Roe <br /> and the following members were absent: none. <br /> Councilmember Johnson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 10967 <br /> RESOLUTION REJECTING PROPOSED GRASS LAKE WATERSHED <br /> MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION JOINT POWERS LANGUAGE AND TO <br /> PETITION DISSOLUTION <br /> WHEREAS,the City of Roseville and the City of Shoreview have a Joint Powers Agreement <br /> in place creating the Grass Lake Water Management Organization for the management of <br /> joint watershed resources pursuant to state statute; <br /> AND WHEREAS,Watershed management and regulation have changed significantly in the <br /> 30 years since the agreement that created the Grass Lake Water Management Organization <br /> was executed; <br /> AND WHEREAS,The Grass Lake WMO Board has requested revisions to the Joint Powers <br /> Agreement necessary for the organization to continue as a WMO; <br /> AND WHEREAS,The cities believe there are existing adjacent watershed organizations that <br /> have the necessary expertise and resources to protect the watershed natural resources in an <br /> effective and efficient manner; <br /> BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Roseville hereby rejects the proposed revised joint <br /> powers agreement language as requested the GLWMO Board, and hereby petitions the <br /> GLWMO Board to dissolve the Organization pursuant to Section VI and Section VII of the <br /> current approved joint powers agreement and state statute requirements; and <br /> The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by <br /> Councilmember Willmus and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor <br />