Laserfiche WebLink
MEETING <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: <br />The City Attorney indicates that this type of ordinance has been approved by the <br />State Supreme Court and the court has specifically stated that ten (10) percent <br />is not an unreasonable amount for a residential subdivisioll. <br />the Council could either establish a future Council meeting for consideration of <br />the ordinance, or refer the proposed ordinance to the Planning Comission for <br />q <br />revi ew, and recommendati on <br />Council Action Requested: Motion referring one of the alternative <br />ordinances providi'ng for a dedication for <br />park purposes at the time of subdivision <br />to the Planning Commission meeting of July 29 <br />for review and recommendation. <br />Mi <br />Motion that the Council consider one of the <br />alternative ordinances providing for a dedication <br />4 <br />for park purposes at the time of subdivision at <br />its meeting of July 14, 1980. <br />