My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1979_0723.ws_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1979
>
1979_0723.ws_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/7/2012 4:37:00 PM
Creation date
2/7/2012 4:36:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
July 23, 1979 - After regular meeting <br />.0 <br />Util ity Services to Duplexes and other Multiple Units <br />M m: Public Works Director, Charles Hanchell <br />The advantages of hav=g a set of services for each individual unit a:L4z_- <br />as follms : <br />It is less likely that sewer backups will occur becau e of the <br />fewer nun-ber of units using the san-e service, and if it should <br />occrur, there is a clearer responsibility for maintenance. <br />2. The City-has a direct is responsibilities to follcwup on <br />to a specific parcel of property for unpaid utility bills. <br />3. Each unit would only pay for what sewer and water it inddualil <br />US PIS I <br />The disadvantages of hav:,Lng a set of services to each unit are as - follcws <br />a 0 <br />It -results in added costs for pipxng and Treters. <br />2. Street patching would be required on-the roadways unless it is <br />a street just being constructed at this tirre. <br />3, The bui.Laing may stay in one a;�mership for all units pexnianently* <br />This is not an easy question to resolve but to bring the question into focus <br />the follcwing is a set of Public Works reccurendations: <br />unit bungs, it is desirable to have only <br />one line set of services.for the entire building. <br />2, On a duplex or single family unit., it is desirable to have a set <br />of services to each unit of the building. <br />3, in lwng brand.new streets, a set of services for each unit <br />of a duplex sbould be built., In existing "below standard" roaaways <br />1 <br />a set of services for each unit of a duplex should be built for new <br />duPle>ms, at the tirre of the splitting of existing duple>ms, or <br />the roadway is rebuilt to the City's standards, <br />4. In "Up to Standard" roadways the dual sets of senaces would not be <br />required to each unit, but individual ownership of these -Luiits is not <br />.wr., ccavende d 0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.