CC_Minutes_2005_0425 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City Council Regular Meeting - 04/25/05 Minutes - Page 23 represent the City of Roseville, not the developer. Tim Callaghan, 3062 Shorewood Lane l) Mr. Callaghan questioned the costs of environmental clean up and how and where they were reflected in the property acquisition; 2) Mr. Callaghan questioned who was the authority to determine whether the redevelopment value fell below 90% of that projected, and whether if the City Council was that authority if it would be under open Public Hearing circumstances; 3) Mr. Callaghan questioned the availability of attachments on the website as indicated on the final term sheet. Mr. Welsch directed Mr. Callaghan as to where to find the attachments on the web site for his review. Mr. Callaghan concluded his comments by suggesting that, given the magnitude of the project, the City Council consider putting the project to a vote at this fall's election and let the people speak, rather than continuing with 3/2 Council votes. Discussion ensued related to state statute provisions for general ballot questions, with City Attorney Squires detailing statute related to Statutory B cities, such as Roseville. Terry Moses, 1776 Maple Lane Mr. Moses suggested that private donations be used to fund an Advisory Vote on the fall ballot. City Attorney Squires opined that, as long as public funds weren't used, that would be appropriate for the City to consider, but would be advisory, not binding on the City Council. Mr. Moses spoke to code regarding park dedication fees and the intent of the code for typical developments where the developer wasn't seeking concessions from the City; opining that the code shouldn't be applicable in this case given the complexities and concessions being requested of the City by the developer. Mr. Moses concurred with the opinions expressed during public