Laserfiche WebLink
MEETING 27-79 <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCI L ACTION D AT E: <br />AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT./DIV.: <br />Hearings Public Works Departirmt. <br />ITE{'t I: ITEM DESCRIPTION. Lydia Court ""' Project 78-9 <br />F <br />DEPT. HEAD APPROVAL. <br />MGR. REVIEWED/ RECOMMENDS'. <br />In J'vae , 1978 a hearing was held to consider the construction of � * guts � <br />paving on ]Lydia fr I d�.a stet to its This hearing was the result <br />of a petiticxn from the pxOperty Ownerse At that tim the total estimated cost was <br />• 4 � have nasal a 1 <br />$17,758, Ends were then taken earlier this year which woul resulted in tots <br />cost of a st $39,000. The pro3ect was, therefore, chid a 1ri this rn t t and <br />resulted in a total estimated cost now of $36,2950 <br />]Estimated frontal were assumed in eadi of these three cases to provide apps i t . <br />assessment rates. Using these app ated frontages, the assessment estimtes were <br />5 a, 61 on • 1, 9 * 20 on the first set of bids and $8.59 on this last set of bids. <br />2iis particular block, h ever, has several lots which are not motangular in. and <br />the odd lot fo in the assessment policy wculd have to be utilized. pause of the <br />special concern as to the rate, the consultant was, therefore, requested last week to <br />go trough all of the calculations for these odd lots and actual nunbers were developed <br />for each lot. 9hi s process resulted in mre total assessable feet than the original <br />assumption. on. The assessment rate per foot, therefore, using these new numbers is <br />reduced to $8,06 per assessable foot <br />A rweting of the property cuners was held VkKInesday evening to discuss the project and <br />review these new rates t but to date, I do not kn the-' -r rea ton of pro . . <br />ners * It is doubtful that re-bidding next would result in any lower lces <br />o the decision should be nude to either approve the project, based on- the last set of <br />bids, or terminate the prof ect i <br />Because e c t are noti..ceabl higher than the ori.g,.al estimtes f the <br />on hearing is nullified axe. this new hearing on August 7, is the procedure which <br />as t he fo llowed o The following is a suggested format to he utilized for the public <br />hearing+ <br />A, mayor calls the hearing on Lydia Court - Project 789 <br />B. mays requests presentation of legal notice by M.mger <br />c. Public TAbrks Director presents sut mny of tune of improvenmt, <br />area involved and cost estimate. <br />D, Fiscal Agent presents sataraxy of financing and assessments <br />E. Manager reads written statements from affected c zens in <br />,regard to said project <br />F. Mayor opens hearing to public. Each speaker is requested to identify <br />himself and the street address of the property he is referring to <br />G. Mayor closes hearing. <br />H. Coumcii action on 1opro t, (Resolution to he prepared by Fiscal Agent) <br />PzecaTnended comcil Action + Adoptim of a resolution ordering Tzprovemnt 78_9 # Dydia. Cow, <br />or approval of a mti.on terminating TxprcveTnent 78-9,r Lydia Court O <br />