Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council Study Session - 03/21/05 <br />Minutes - Page 9 <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder spoke in support of the motion, with <br />the exclusion of Step 3 (Final Documents and Assist with <br />Bidding) and Step 4 (Construction Services). <br /> <br />Mr. Brokke noted that Step 5 (Evaluate the Option of a Plate and <br />Frame Chiller-Type System) and Step 6 (Evaluate the Feasibility <br />of Connecting the RSVC Arena to the John Rose OVAL's <br />Refrigeration System) would need to be done before Steps 3 and <br />4. Mr. Brokke referenced the scope of services and the Xcel <br />Energy rebate funding. <br /> <br />City Manager Beets noted the "not to exceed" language of this <br />proposed contract, and the favorability to the City in bidding the <br />proposal in a comprehensive fashion, rather than piecemeal, in <br />saving time, effort and money in rebidding portions. Mr. Beets <br />noted that the Council was not authorizing Steven's Engineering <br />to complete the steps without City Council authorization based <br />on the advice of the Task Force findings, following public <br />hearing, discussion and Task Force recommendations. <br /> <br />Discussion included definition of "reimbursables," other sources <br />for funding the study; lack of available firms submitting <br />proposals as requested; and reducing energy costs and possible <br />alternatives. <br /> <br />Klausing moved, Maschka seconded, an amendment authorizing <br />the Parks and Recreation Department to enter into an agreement <br />with Stevens Engineering for an hourly, not to exceed amount of <br />$28,500 plus reimbursables, for professional engineering <br />services, for steps 1-6, as outlined in the proposal dated January <br />26, 2005; with staff directed to report back to the City Council <br />prior to taking Steps 3 and/or 4; with the funds to be taken from <br />the City Building Replacement Fund. <br /> <br />Roll Call (Amendment) <br />Ayes: Schroeder, Ihlan, Kough, Maschka and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />Further discussion included the complexity of the decision and <br />issue; the qualifications and timing of the proposal received from <br />BEM Corporation; and possible alternatives for redesign or <br />