Laserfiche WebLink
~e~.tka M. Stidd, esq. ~c~ptezr7be;r 27~ 197 <br />k'a~e <br />these ~~:nera:I ~=c~wer~~ are to k;e canstr~5.aea ~road:Ly in the same man- <br />1~.e~° as the general pc~wc~rs o:~" homr~ rtr:l.e ck~artcr~ cit:~es . .hand <br />~i~.west Cc~. v. ~'~.~,1~.~c~~' ~tch:~i~;l,d.~ ~~~ ~~.n~n. s~7a ~~~~ 14 ~I.W.2d <br />~1~, ~~® (~.~~~a}, A series of consistent apinic~ns of ~.:he .Attorney <br />Generale ~..n~~ludin~~ twa cspin~.ans rendered i.n ~.9~~, concluded that <br />~I <br />the authority to cc~nr~uct advisary vot€~,~ cou2ck nat be irrlplie~.. In <br />197$ the ~.eis~.ature er'iacted s~ubdiv`isic~n ~ expressly authorizing <br />lizrz3.ted advisory vates. i~i3.nn. Uaws 1~~7s ch. ~~~~ '~. Tn view of <br />the extreme~.y brraa~. grant of mun:~c~.p~.l pc~we~°~ tc~ ~ri~.~,a~ea ~rx ~uladi~ <br />prison ~~, it wc~ul~d ~zave kaeen unnecessary tc, provide e~.press auth- <br />arity ft~r ad~~risc~.ry vc~~es- in sukadivision 33, un~.ess the le~is~.ature <br />itself' c:ancurred ~,n the cr~nclusiara. raf ths~re ap~.n:~ans. <br />4. All of the fo~alr~w~.n1~ opi.rrl,c~ns conc~.ude that an advi.~ary <br />vote is not permitted abse~~t e:~press authority; tip. Atty. Qen. <br />~.$~, ae tember ~~., 1~4~~i (ca°4znt~~}~ Gpb Atty. Qen. 64~-~~, Febxtuar~y <br />~.>, 19~ (Qwator°rrra} ~ tip. atty. Gen. ~~~~G} Janua.ry ~.~, 19~~ (Austin} q <br />CJ° . Attar. .Gen. ~~-~~ April. l~, ~.~~~i (:Leepy rye}~ ar~.d dp. Att,y. Gen. <br />6~~q~, July 2~~ 1~6~ (G~inc~na}. In spry Atty. t~erz. 64-~~ August l~, <br />~ s it was canclu~ed. th~.t ~'kich:field cauid a~.c~pt a eharte:~ amend- <br />ment ata.tharizir-~~ adviaaxty '~a~_lats . Thv~ opinion gent- ran try ray that <br />sine ~ich~'~,.eid ~ s ch~.rter ~a`~'e it "all pa~,v°ers wkiickl i.t may naw or <br />hereafter be poss;S.b.~,~ri tc~ haves ~~n ordinar~Ge ratkaer than a charter <br />amendment was proper. `~°hc~ grant caf kac~~~.er in the M~.nneapoli~t char_ <br />ter is different from th~.~: in. tkrP ~tich~'~.eld cl~.~.~,rter. Therefore, <br />the opinion cues nat a~.c~ re;v~.eva ~}~' the M~.nneapal~.s dacument . Zrl <br />©p. Atty. Gerz. ~~~g C~ctc~k~er ~a, ~.~~~~ it was kae:i.d that ~, ra~ur~~ cruld <br />c©raduc~t an advisor~F elec:tiar~ on the adopt~.or~ of a c~aunty zar~iing or-- <br />di:rAance . The e~piraion ~.~ ~.raconsister7.t. with. al:r. px'i ova opinions of the <br />~7ffice of tk'~e~ Attorney Gencra~. (~.nc;luc~in~ the cane it purports to re 1.y <br />are}, it fairs to pr~,perl~r ahszerv~u the ~,e~islafFive h~.story cited at,av~v~, <br />and it is inconsistent vrith case la..~v ire other ~L~ri.sd:.i..ctic~ns. <br />