My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1978_1023_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1978
>
1978_1023_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2012 2:55:38 PM
Creation date
2/13/2012 2:52:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEETING 10-23-78 <br />DATE: ....... <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />AGENDA SECTION: <br />i;ORIGINATING DEPT./DIV.: <br />Reports & Reccnuendaticns <br />I Adm <br />DEPT. HEAD APPROVAL, <br />�-j <br />i <br />ITEM DESCRiPTION. W, Dm Ibberts zequest for amnd-ing MGR. REVIEWED/ RECOMMEMD5 <br />cmaticnal use permit for grading work at 2805 Fairview Ave, � <br />The Council at its October 2, meting approved Mr, Don RDberts request for <br />cmditicnal Use Permit for grading work at 2805 Fairview Avenue '-th the <br />W.1 <br />following conditions: <br />I <br />1, That the grading be done in a niamer that would e 11minate <br />direCt draining fran the grading area to Langton Lake until <br />such tire as the bui ng and final grading pernit is issued <br />for the site, <br />2, r1hat the graded area be seeded by June 1. 1979, unless a <br />pern-ft is also issued before that date, <br />That the provasions of the associated fill perrnit - inclujing fees <br />and a $400 deposit be followed, <br />4, That no grading be done witWn 90- feet of the north property line. <br />Attached is a letter from Mr. Pcberts requesting that the conditional use <br />Permit be mended tO Pernldt grading to wn 20 -feet of the norLh property 1 <br />Mr. McGuire, Assistant City Engineer, will atterept to neet with Mr, Rrberts <br />I*rior to the Council rmeting to discuss the engineering aspects of this request, <br />Because the residents in the neighborhood were in attenclaace at the council reetir <br />at which the previous action was taken and had reviewed the plan which had included <br />the 90 fOOt. setback, they were notified this aftexmoon and advised that this matter <br />would be on the agenda . <br />1-riere has not been a review of this request by Mt. Dahlgmn because of the tizz <br />Uraitations . <br />am <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.