My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-05-26_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2011
>
2011-05-26_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 10:39:21 AM
Creation date
2/15/2012 10:37:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
5/26/2011
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tom's Comments <br />5.23.11 <br />Overall, I see no voids in the content and context of the document. As soon as the TMDL <br />is completed, however, I would assume that the Plan will need an amendment to include <br />specific BMPs /controls needed to achieve water quality standards, etc. <br />I see many references to the Board investigating alternative finance and governance <br />structures post Plan adoption. In light of the Task -force established by the board on <br />5.19.11, I would remove any and all reference to Board investigation /discussion post Plan <br />adoption and say the Board will explore options mentioning no time -line. <br />I would recommend the Plan require that the DNR's Lake Aquatic Vegetation <br />Management Plants) for any and all lakes within GLWMO be approved and adopted by <br />GLWMO before the DNR's Plants) are effective. <br />I recommend the GLWMO wetland policy include language that requires that all wetland <br />impacts (within GLWMO) are replaced within the GLWMO watershed or other <br />GLWMO Board approved location if no site can be found in GLWMO. I would hope that <br />a Wetland Replacement Plan could be part of the GLWMO Wetland Management Plan. <br />Note: I would assume that an amendment to the GLWMO Plan will be required to <br />include specific management criteria that will transcend WCA rules. <br />I recommend the Groundwater section reference working with other LGUs' collectively <br />to implement groundwater protection. I do not see the County adopting a revised <br />groundwater protection plan anytime soon. Therefore, I hope to, as a private citizen, to <br />talk the 10 WMOs in Ramsey county into forming a confederation of water authorities <br />and utilizing the RCD's September 2010 draft Groundwater Plan as a model for joint <br />agency groundwater protection activities. <br />Add to the implementation table participating in inter - agency groundwater protection <br />activities. <br />I would also recommend the Plan include including the finance of $100K to $150K per <br />year from 2013 out - -- to assist the cities implement stormwater retro -fit activities and /or <br />fund activities as GLWMO sponsored projects. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.