Laserfiche WebLink
memo <br />9of11 <br />Comment (TP) I recommend the Groundwater section reference working with other LGUs' collectively to <br />implement groundwater protection. I do not see the County adopting a revised <br />groundwater protection plan anytime soon. Therefore, I hope to, as a private citizen, to <br />talk the 10 WMOs in Ramsey County into forming a confederation of water authorities <br />and utilizing the RCD's September 2010 draft Groundwater Plan as a model for joint <br />agency groundwater protection activities. <br />Response Reference to working with other LGU's will be made. <br />Comment (TP) Add to the implementation table participating in inter - agency groundwater protection <br />activities. <br />Response This change will be made to the plan <br />Comment (TP) I would also recommend the Plan include including the finance of $100K to $150K per <br />year from 2013 out - -- to assist the cities implement stormwater retro -fit activities and/or <br />fund activities as GLWMO sponsored projects. <br />Response This requires Board discussion. <br />Comment (CW) In an effort to further define the relative contributions of internal vs external phosphorus loading <br />to Lake Owasso, I would like to put much emphasis on the need to continue a key activity which <br />was stressed in the Barr UAA. Through analyses and computation, annual water and phosphorus <br />budgets need to be generated which identify the relative percent contributions of each of the <br />various sources to the annual water and phosphorus loads. I was hoping this would be in the scope <br />of the MPCA TMDL. I firmly believe it is a necessary requirement to be included in the <br />implementation activities of the Plan. This would satisfy my concerns and the issue could be <br />considered resolved. <br />Response We agree that conducting a annual and phosphorous budget will be an important activities for the <br />GLWMO to continue conducting as it addresses the water quality issues in the Lake Owasso <br />watershed. How this budget is conducted will need to be worked out and the implementation plan <br />will need to be revised to reflect the fact that this will not be conducted by the GLWMO ( an noth <br />through the TMDL process). <br />Watershed Management Organization Administration <br />Comment (KE) under Section 8.1 Grass lake WMO Governance change the following sentence: " While <br />the GLWMO board of Commissioners has begun researching options such as merging <br />with the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District or the Vadnais Lake Area <br />Watershed Management Organization or significantly changing the GLWMO's funding <br />source, the Board will not make any recommendations for change in governance and/or <br />finance until 90 dyas after the 2011 GLWMO Watershed Management Plan has been <br />approved by the BWSR and adonted by the GLWMO Board of Commissioners. In <br />addition, add the following sentence to the end of the same paragraph: "The GLWMO <br />has created a special citizen task force to research the options with the GLWMO Board." <br />Response This change will be made to the plan <br />Comment (TP) I see many references to the Board investigating alternative finance and governance <br />structures post Plan adoption. In light of the Task -force established by the board on <br />Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc. <br />651 Hale Ave N, Oakdale, MN 55128 p: 651.770.8448 f: 651.770.2552 www.eorinc.com <br />