My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-01-19_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2012
>
2012-01-19_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 11:06:40 AM
Creation date
2/15/2012 11:05:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/19/2012
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
We have approximately $7,000 dedicated in our current fund balance for future <br />cost -share projects. I recommend we do not add to this amount from our 2012 <br />Budget until such time as the cities indicate a willingness to provide additional <br />dollars to the program. I also recommend we place a deadline for encumbering <br />(approving projects) for remaining funds as of May 1. 2012 and require projects <br />be completed by September 1, 2012. <br />Note: Several project plans were developed in 2011 with a property owner <br />decision pending whether to seek cost - share. I u°ill contact the folks with .'Plans' <br />and convey that we have modified our program to a first- come - first- served <br />funding through May 1St or until funding is gone. The cost -share agreements will <br />reflect a September I" deadline for project completion or the cost -share is void. <br />• Professional Services Agreement with the Ramsey Conservation District <br />I recommend we utilize 52,000 to assist cost -share project cooperators <br />finalize and complete projects that we have current designs in place. <br />However, more will be necessary it additional cost -share revenues are added to <br />the existim: funds. <br />Please note. Until we know more about additional cost to complete the 3`1 <br />Generation Plan and if the cities are willing to provide revenue in 2012,1 am <br />proposing a very limited public conservation practice assistance program and <br />will remove reference of'the program from the GLWMO web -rite. <br />® TMDUWRAPP <br />We will need to dedicate at least $37.500 of funds to match the MPCA grant for <br />this project/study. I recommend we decouple the TMDL IW-RAPP from the <br />draft Watershed Plan and utilize the funds needed for match to complete the <br />Plan. We would not partner with MPCA for a WRAPPITMDL. <br />® Sub- watershed analysis in south Lake Owasso drainage area <br />I recommend we utilize S6K to partner with RCD to perform study in south <br />Owasso drainage areas. Estimated project cost is $12K and could be completed <br />in two months. Project funding would be a cost -share match between the RCD <br />and OLWMO. Depending on timing, data could be added to the Plan. <br />• Administrative Budget <br />Your current agreements (Tom and Sheila) are month to month and you have a <br />$3K monthly- cap placed on the Administrator. This should be sufficient control <br />to minimize expenditures. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.