2012-02-16_AgendaPacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 o Postage for mailing hard copy of responses to Plan review comments to State review agencies in the amount of $20.16 Ramsey Conservation District (RCD) Fourth Quarter 2011 Technical Services for cost - share program costs (Ryan Johnson): Invoice #121411GL in the amount of $1,500.00 Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 Motion carried. Public Comment Period No one was present in the audience to speak at this time. Goals and Benchmarks for 2012 Chair Miller advised that, with this being the first meeting of 2012, Board fhmg be wish to outline their list of things to accomplish in 2012, some of which may have over go o in' 'ate this discussion, Chair Miller advised that he and Mr. Petersen had new info o share Board as a result of meetings held with both FOR and representatives from B and the PCA earl' this week. Chair Miller advised that it was BWSR's position that until LW tore governance has been determined, they would not review and/or approve the Dra hird Generation Plan; and Chair Miller advised that, it was unlikely that a formal Plan would be a d before a "merger action" by one or both of the cities occurred, with the Plan remaining in draft form e ong with other studies and documented data as a guide for managing the water resources once ged with and adjacent water management authority. Sam, City Actions Regarding Future Governance St Chair Miller reviewed the schedule for member drafted a resolution for the Roseville City Counc recommending that they reject the revised Joint petition dissolution of the GL Cha eafte the ir Mille follow suit shortly ther , st availablg voting in support of the uncil tions pending, with Mr. Schwartz having or their January 23, 2012 regular business meeting ow rs Agreement (JPA) language and proceed to cipated that the Shoreview City Council would usiness meeting; and envisioned both member cities WMO. Chair Miller reviewed the that would follow, based on his understanding, for BWSR and the member cities deter 'nation o rger option to pursue; and anticipated that the existing GLWMO and its Board at sour t in the future during that process, but most likely before year -end 2012. Ch ' iller a that ing that process, current contracts would need to be terminated or transfe to the cities o new governing organization. St s to for the PP Mr. Peter ted th willingness of the MPCA to approve the WRAPP work plan and sign a contract with FOR, e need to proceed with a Request for Proposal (RFP) for monitoring services this spring. Mr. Pe en advised that their apparent rationale was that they didn't want to invest funds in the WRAPP with t some level of assurance that there would be an implementation plan as an outcome of that WRAPP, particularly based on the past reputation and current status of the GLWMO. Therefore, Mr. Petersen advised that the MPCA was not including the GLWMO's WRAPP in the current funding cycle, but would include the WRAPP in their 2013 fiscal year, beginning in July of 2012, with the assumption that a new governance structure for the GLWMO area would be in place. IN summary, Mr. Petersen advised that, essentially, the WRAPP was on hold until July of 2012 at the earliest. Mr. Petersen asked for Member Von De Linde's recollection of the meeting held in March of 2011 at former Chair Karen Eckman's home with Mr. Schwartz, himself, Ms. Lewis from BWSR, and Ms. 2