My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-02-16_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2012
>
2012-02-16_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 11:09:26 AM
Creation date
2/15/2012 11:07:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/16/2012
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
tLake Vegetation Management Plan <br />when these invasive species are actively growing and when many native species remain dormant <br />(Netherland et al. 2000). <br />There are no treatment regimes that are 100% selective for only invasive species. However, there are <br />some treatment regimes that are more selective using low dose, targeted herbicides, and timing of <br />treatment to reduce the impacts to native plants. The above information on herbicides, timing, and <br />target concentration are the current understanding of "selective control" for curlyleaf pondweed and <br />Eurasian watermilfoil. Selective control of invasive species is an evolving science and the treatment <br />protocol may change as new information becomes available. If the treatment protocol changes the new <br />treatment protocol and why it was changed will be added to the LVMP in appendix 4 and those <br />conditions will be incorporated into the APM pemrits. <br />Section VI: Treatment Plan, B. Individual Permit Standards <br />Permit standards for individual shorelines are in place to ensure each shoreline retains some aquatic <br />habitat. Near -shore habitat, which are the most frequent targets for control efforts by shoreline property <br />owners, are particularly important as habitat for young or small fish, and have the greatest diversity of <br />non -game fish and amphibians (Poe et al. 1986; Bryan and Scarnecchia 1992; Weaver et al. 1997). <br />Many species of mammals and waterfowl depend on these aquatic plants for food and nesting sites and <br />are especially important for laying females whose reproductive success is closely tied to the availability <br />of aquatic plants (Krull 1970; Bellrose 1976; Batt et al. 1992: 7 -9). Development is increasing on lakes <br />(particularly in the metro area) and entire reaches of near -shore habitat have been impacted through <br />development. Having restrictions on the amount of shoreline individual properties can treat, allows each <br />property owner to have access to the lake while retaining some of the near -shore habitat that is so critical <br />for fish and wildlife. These restrictions also allow for an equitable distribution of aquatic plant <br />management activities among all riparian property owners while mitigating the cumulative impacts on <br />the lake as a whole. <br />Appendix 2: Water quality data. <br />All Lake Owasso water quality data may be found on the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency website. <br />http: / /www.pca. state.mn.us/ water / clmp /lkwgReadFull.cfm ?lakeid =62 -0056 <br />http: / /www.pca. state.mn.us/ water /clmp /clmpSearchResult.cfm ?lakeid =62 -0056 <br />Lake Owasso LVMP 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.