Laserfiche WebLink
In addition, it was suggested that the GLWMO Board of Commissioners hold off on making a <br />decision about governance structure and roll this evaluation into the first three years of the 2011 <br />Watershed Management Plans activities. <br />Recommended Action: Decide if the GLWMO is comfortable writing a plan that focuses on the <br />first three years of activity (still a 10 -year plan) acknowledging that a major plan amendment will <br />be drafted in year 4 to account for (1) structural practices developed in the TMDL <br />Implementation Plan and (2) governance /financing decisions. <br />2. Governance - If the GLWMO intends to move forward with the governance /financing options in <br />2011, this decision will have to be made before future plan revisions can be made as this decision <br />affects a significant number of the comments made by the BWSR and the Metropolitan Council. <br />Recommended Action: If the Board decides to move forward with decisions regarding <br />governance and financing in 2011 agree to put the plan development process on hold until this <br />decision is made. <br />3. Joint Powers Agreement — This document needs to be revised and approved before the <br />Watershed Management Plan can be approved. <br />Recommended Action: Complete the revised IPA before the plan submittal for the 45 -day review <br />process. <br />Implementation Specifics - One of the over - riding points in BWSR's comments is providing <br />more specifics regarding how things are going to get done in the future. For example, <br />implementation activities need to identify who is responsible for doing what and what the sources <br />of funding are for implementation ( GLWMO BMP Cost -Share Program, cities MS4 permitting <br />requirements, Lake Owasso Homeowners Association or grant assistance). On this note, Section <br />7 Implementation Plan needs more description of how existing programs (Education and <br />Outreach, Cost -Share Incentive Program, Monitoring Program) will work or how specifically <br />they are being or will be administered. One recommendation for the Board's consideration is <br />establishing a "Technical Support Program" that articulates how the GLWMO will select <br />technical support to implement the projects, CIPs, etc. identified in the watershed management <br />plan. <br />Recommended Action: Make a decision on the following specific recommendations made by <br />EOR: <br />a. Add the following text to the introductory paragraph of Section 7.0 Implementation Plan: <br />"An annual work plan developed by GLWMO Staff and the Board of Commissioners will <br />detail the programs and projects to be completed in a given year. The GLWMO will conduct <br />an annual prioritization and selection of projects for each year based on effectiveness of <br />projects performed in past years; progress toward meeting the organization's goals, strategies, <br />and implementation actions; changing resource conditions; and financial constraints." <br />b. Revise section 7.1 Programs as follows: "The GLWMO will manage four programs to assist <br />the organization in meeting its goals: Education and Outreach Program; Cost -Share Incentive <br />Program; Monitoring Program; and Technical Support Program. All program areas will have <br />a program evaluation component. Project and program evaluations will clearly state <br />Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc. <br />651 Hale Ave N, Oakdale, MN 55128 p: 651.770.8448 f: 651.770.2552 www.eorinc.com <br />