Laserfiche WebLink
357 <br />358 The makers of the motion amended their motion to make changes on lines 9 and 13 as proposed. <br />359 <br />360 Additional discussion included funds for educating Board members as well, such as sending one <br />361 (1) Board member annually to meetings of MAD (MN Association of Watershed Districts); <br />362 involvement of Board members in agencies sharing similar concerns; identifying the intent of the <br />363 CIP category for various municipal projects and for leveraging grants toward total project costs <br />364 (line 16) and how it varies from cost -share for BMP's for private /corporate projects versus public <br />365 infrastructure projects depending on the scale of specific projects. <br />366 <br />367 Action Steu <br />368 Mr. Petersen advised that he would revise the budget and submit a copy to Mr. Miller <br />369 immediately to have available prior to his presentation on November 21, 2011. <br />370 <br />371 Member Miller questioned if this budget, if approved going forward, accurately reflected further <br />372 costs or if it underestimated realities, opining that the Board couldn't politically request more <br />373 than the $300,000 annually due to political constraints, but expressing concern that it was still an <br />374 inadequate budget. <br />375 <br />376 Chair Eckman opined that her response to such a question from City Councilmembers would be <br />377 that the annual projected budget would suffice until the WRAPP was completed, and that after the <br />378 first three (3) years leading up to completion, it most likely would not be sufficient. <br />379 <br />380 Member Barrett shared similar concerns; however, he noted that at this time the budget remained <br />381 a best -guess estimate, but that it still represented a significant increase over current budgets; and <br />382 until an improved GLWMO had more experience, it served to move forward to achieve <br />383 implementation goals of the Third Generation Plan. <br />384 <br />385 Mr. Petersen noted that he had addressed this in his cover letter, that $300,000, while speculative, <br />386 would be a sufficient annual budget until the WRAPP was completed and identified BMP's for <br />387 prioritization and timing. <br />388 <br />389 Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Motion carried. <br />390 <br />391 E) Updates: <br />392 1) Special Governance and Finance Committee (Westerberg and Miller) <br />393 Member Miller summarized his "Report of the Governance and Financing Task Force for <br />394 the Grass Lake Watershed Management Organization" dated November 15, 2011, to be <br />395 presented to member City Councils on November 21, 2011. <br />396 <br />397 Member Miller opined that while his presentation attempted to be objective and present <br />398 the majority position determined at the November 4, 2011 Special GLWMO Board <br />399 meeting at which Vice Chair Chuck Westerberg and Members Jonathan Miller, Mary <br />400 Kaye Von De Linde, and Steve Barrett were in attendance; he anticipated presentation by <br />401 Task Force member Jim DeBenedet of a Minority Report supporting merger of the <br />402 GLWMO with the Ramsey/Washington Area WSD and voting against the GLWMO <br />403 remaining independent, even as an "Improved GLWMO." <br />404 <br />405 Member Miller anticipated several other Task Force members would be signing on; and <br />406 advised that it also represented his minority position and rationale in voting against <br />407 remaining an independent WMO, and was planning to add his signature to the minority <br />8 <br />