My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2005_0523
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2005
>
CC_Minutes_2005_0523
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:26:20 AM
Creation date
6/30/2005 4:23:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/23/2005
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Margaret Driscoll <br /> <br />From: <br />'ent: <br />,'0: <br />Subject: <br /> <br />Jay T. Squires Usquires@ratwiklaw.com] <br />Thursday, June 02, 20059:51 AM <br />Margaret Driscoll <br />FW: Your comments as documented in the minutes of 5/9/05 re: ballot referendum for Twin <br />Lakes <br /> <br />I have reviewed the minutes. They are not inconsistent with my recollection of my <br />comments. As I recall, a citizen (Mr. Hauk?) got up during the comment period and talked <br />about Twin Lakes. He suggested I had opined that there were no legal impediments to an <br />advisory election, so long as it was privately funded. The issue had first corne up late on <br />the evening of the Town Hall meeting held at the school by Concordia Academy. I recalled <br />offering my off the cuff comment that the issue raised public purpose expenditure issues, <br />and that it was in the nature of initiative and referendum. When the citizen quoted me, I <br />clarified that I had not done any thorough research, and that there may well be other <br />impediments that needed to be reviewed. We conducted the research, and had the written <br />opinion for the Council the following Monday. <br /> <br />Given my above recollection of things, I believe the minutes accurately reflect the <br />discussion. <br /> <br />The information contained in this electronic message is attorney-client privileged and <br />confidential information and is intended only for the use of the individual(s) to whom <br />this electronic message is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended <br />recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, <br />you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this electronic <br />communication or any attachment thereto is strictly prohibited. If you have received this <br />electronic communication in error, you should immediately return it to us and delete the <br />message from your system. Thank you. <br /> <br />>> "Margaret Driscoll" <margaret.driscoll@ci.roseville.mn.us> 06/02/05 <br />09:40AM >>> <br /> <br />> -----Original Message----- <br />> From: Margaret Driscoll <br />> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 1:12 PM <br />> To: 'jtsquires@ratwiklaw.com' <br />> Cc: Cindy Anderson <br />> Subject: Your comments as documented in the minutes of 5/9/05 <br />re: <br />> ballot referendum for Twin Lakes <br />> Importance: High <br />> <br />> Jay <br />> <br />> At the 5/23/05 City Council meeting Ihlan questioned the minutes of <br />> May 9 regarding the ballot referendum for Twin Lakes: <br />> <br />> Council Meeting of May 9, 2005 <br />> Schroeder moved, Ihlan seconded, approval of the May 9, 2005 Regular <br />> Meeting as amended. <br />> <br />> Corrections: <br />> * Page 2, 2nd paragraph; Public Comment, Richard Houck (Ihlan) <br />> Staff was directed to review with City Attorney Squires the statement <br />> he made and that statement as reflected in the minutes to determine <br />> its accuracy; and to revise the statement if warranted. <br />> <br /> <br />Roll Call <br />? Ayes: <br />> Nays: <br />> Abstentions: <br /> <br />Kough; Ihlan; Schroeder and Klausing. <br />None. <br />Maschka. <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.