My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1978_0109_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1978
>
1978_0109_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 1:02:21 PM
Creation date
2/17/2012 11:38:16 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
December 7, 1977 <br />PtANNIP�G REPORT <br />CASE NUMBER: <br />APPLICANT: <br />LOCAT I fl�i : <br />ACTION REQU�STED: <br />PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: <br />� <br />1480-77 <br />Paul Roberts <br />Between Albemarle and Rice Street, <br />narth of Skillman Avenue (see sketch) <br />Rezoning from B-1 to R--2 and Approval <br />of Preliminary Plat <br />1. The property in question is the land that Paul Raberts recently requested <br />be rezoned ia the R-6 Townhouse Dis'trict for the purpose of constructing <br />24 townhouse units. You will recaZl that 11 of ihose townhouse units <br />were to be oriented tawards Albemarle Street and the remair�der towards. <br />Rice Street. The Cauncil denied ihat petition based primarily on their <br />reluctance to convert business zoned land (S-1) for resideniial <br />develo�ment. There was a�so concern expressed by the neighbors regarding <br />the increase in traffic from the 11 units proposed �o be oriented tou�lards <br />Albemarle Street_ <br />2. The total property involved (between Albema�rle Street and_Rice 5treet} is <br />2.18 acres. Pir. Roberts �roposes at this time to rezone the westerly .876 <br />acres from B-1 to R-2, and plat th� land into faur duplex lo�s. Each af <br />the duplex lots would have a frantage of 83.75 feet (85 feet required) and <br />a depth af 114 feet. Each lot would have a 1and area of 9,547.5 �eei <br />{11,000 sguare feet required). The dif�erences between the proposed lat <br />sizes and the m�nimum required in the ordinance we feel are not significant. <br />If the land is to be developed far duplex purposes, we feel that �he <br />subdivision as praposed is a reasonable ane. <br />3. The westerly 33 feet of the land is a vacated portion of Albemarle Street <br />(60 feet of Albemarle Street still remains to the west). Previous rezoning <br />indicated this vacated portian ta be zaned R-2. l�e have since researched <br />this question more fully. The City Attarney advises �s that this vacated <br />portion of Albemarle Street is in fiact zoned B-1, ;rhich is t�e zoning of <br />tl�e con�iguo�s oraperty. The land to the west, acrass Albemarle Street, <br />is zoned R-2. <br />4. The positive things about this proposal include the fact <br />development of duplex units on the westerly 114 feet of <br />precludes business traff�c from using Albemarle Street. <br />possible, of course, to deve1op the�B-i land with access <br />on1y, thaugh this is not a legal requirement in the se�s <br />Street is contiguous to the west side of the property. <br />that the <br />the property <br />It would be <br />to Rice Street <br />e that Albemarle <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.