My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_10316B
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
10xxx
>
10300
>
res_10316B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:26:28 AM
Creation date
7/1/2005 1:05:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Meeting Date
6/20/2005
Resolution #
10316B
Resolution Title
A RESOLUTION RESTATING THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO.1, CREATING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 17 AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE SUBDISTRICT NO. 17 A, AND ADOPTING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS RELATING THERETO.
Resolution Date Passed
6/20/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />EXHIBIT B - SPECIFIC FINDINGS FOR DISTRICT <br /> <br />In addition to the findings included in Exhibit A, the reasons and facts supporting the <br />additional findings for the District Plan for the District pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, <br />Section 469.175, Subdivision 3, are as follows: <br /> <br />1. Finding that the District is a "redevelopment district" as defined in Minnesota <br />Statutes. <br /> <br />The District consists of 21 parcels totaling approximately 77.4 acres. Of this <br />acreage, it has been determined that parcels comprising approximately 77.4 acres are <br />occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or similar structures. <br />This 100% area coverage exceeds the 70% coverage test required by Minnesota <br />Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(1). Additionally, over 67% of the buildings <br />have been determined to be "structurally substandard" because they contain defects in <br />structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light <br />and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior <br />partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total <br />significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance. This 67% satisfies the <br />requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(1) which requires <br />that over 50% of buildings, not including outbuildings, must be found "structurally <br />substandard." It has further been determined that these conditions are reasonably <br />distributed through the District. These findings and the conclusion that the District <br />qualifies under the statutory criteria and formulas for a redevelopment tax increment <br />financing district are further described in a report prepared by LHB Engineers & Architects <br />dated June 14, 2005 (the "LHB Report"). <br /> <br />2. Finding that the proposed development within the District, in the opinion of <br />the Council, would not occur solely through private investment within the <br />reasonably foreseeable future and, therefore, the use of tax increment financing is <br />deemed necessary. <br /> <br />Redevelopment activities proposed to occur in the District include the construction <br />of approximately 730 loft, townhome and senior condominium housing units, 225,00 <br />square feet of corporate and other office space, and 325,000 square feet of retail and <br />restaurant space over a four to five year period. Upon completion of this redevelopment, <br />the City's tax base will increase approximately $182,186,545, from $30,189,700 to <br />$212,376,245. <br /> <br />City staff has reviewed the estimated redevelopment costs including land and <br />building acquisition, demolition, relocation, infrastructure improvements, site preparation <br />and improvements, and environmental remediation as well as the available methods of <br />financing. The estimated redevelopment costs are approximately $65.9 million, however, <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.