1976_0809_CC_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

.. �_ engineer from Ba�her Ringrose, representing the appli.cant, indicatcd that the property, if �evelaped as proposed, wo�zld generate approximately 3,90Q vehicle trips per day. Discussion �t Frank Hasselman, Gluek Lane, indicated fhe xesidents £eel that the amount of traffic ge,�erated by �his propasal. wi�l create tra�£�c congestion an.d hazzards. ��irs. Margaret Sr[zith, 1705 Ryan, expressed cancern about the effect of the development on B and Sne7.Iing. She urged -�he Planning Commi.ssion to urge the Council ta place a moratorium an the development of tihis property until the traf£ic prob].em at B and Snelling i� resolved. A#r. Hasselman irEdicated that ihe residents want the property dev�loped as badiy as the o�,�ner but that rhey are very concex�ned about traf�ic. �ir. Don Panzer, represen�i�g the Brimali PTA, expressed concern abaut the sa£ety on County Raad B far the children. %�-, Dwayne Burg, 1835 Gluek Lane, felt that the xeaJ. xssu� ti�ras whe�her there �das gaing �o be retail sales south of Highway 36, He stated that he would no� want to see thataccur. F�-operty owner on Gluek Lane inquxred what wauld happen to the property if these tises taere nat approved. I�ir. Griffin responded that xf the plan were turned dQwn he felt re�ail uses an the proparty wa, pxoba�l.y not going �Co be approved. He stated that A11ied S-COres mus� use the land far economic res.sans and, thexefore, �he only recauxse would be to sel� it for a use campatible irith the I-� zone. �ir. Malone, Gl�,r.ek Lane, preferred �hat indus�rial deveZopment occur on the prapex°ty. He f td nothing undesirable about an industrial use. He fel.t that the City shouid conduct its a�V,� traf�ic study in the area. AIr. Dahlgren indicated that he personally fel� an indus�rial use in the axea woul.d not be compatible with other uses such as residential, schools and the park. He �e1t that the mixture of uses included in this proposal would be the best overall solution to �he po'ten�ial traffic problem that may be caused by develapmen�C of the praperty. i�irs. Margery Altman, G1uek i�ane, indicated that 'the residents do not want retail south of Highway 3b. She stated she daes not tivan� traffic aIl day and 7 aays a week. She wou],d prefer ta have industrial development. I��r. Rukavina zndica�ed thatit was a very nzce development but he �el-� that the traffic xemains to be a problem. He stated that the item which comes to the fron� is the ].arge vo�.ume a£ traffic generated by LaBe�.le's. He �ta�ed his opposi�ion to the prop�sal because af the �raf f ic . !fr. Si.mons ind�Cated that he was opposed aesthetically to indus�rial t�ses in the area. HahTever, he a�.so was concerned about �he traffic generated by the propased d�velopment. �1r. Mas�.e1 indzcated -that he was concerned abaut the traffic safety artd cangest�on and that he opposed the development. '7r. G. Jol�n.san expressed his concexx� about what could be built on tixe propex'ty in. the �-1 zQning. He stated that he was a little bit opposed to co�nercial development south of 36, �� that he had to consider this as a reasonable appla.�ation..