Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />June 2, 1976 <br />P�AfVNING REPORT <br />CAS� iVI�NiBER: <br />APPL�CANT: <br />LOCATION: <br />ACTION R�QUEST£D: <br />PLANi�ING CONSIDERATIONS: <br />975-i6 <br />Victor Vik, 2118 P�Eidlothian Road <br />East 5zde of Fulham 5treet, North of <br />County Road B �see sketch) <br />Appraval o-F Prel i m� nary P1 at <br />l. The property }n question, as shown on the ske-�ch at the lef�, has <br />39I feet af frontage on Fulham Street and a depth of 150.34 feet. <br />The appiicant propases ta div�de tF�e land in�a four single -�amily , <br />lo�s ti�1i t�t 97.75 feet of frantage eacF�. Thi s produces a 1 ot area af <br />14,654 square �'eet. As you knaw, the m�nimum standard in the <br />ordinance is 85 -�eet of frontage and 11,000 square feei of land area <br />on interiar 7ats of �his kzn�. <br />2. �'he 7ots across the s�ree� hav� 129 feet of frantag� and a dep�h o-f <br />135 fee�, or a lot area of 17,415 s�uare feet. Sev�ral years ago, <br />this proposa7 was turned do�vn by the C�ty due to opposit�on by the <br />ne-ighbors� regarding the lat size, <br />3. East of the property i i� questl or� , there are 1 o-ts of 2.3 acres ti» th <br />about 600 fee� of deptt� and 160 feet of fron�age off of Coun�ry Raad �. <br />A7� of thsse prop�rties were pre�iously a-Ffected by �he p�^esence o�F <br />pond�ng areas w�ic� are now provided for by th� insta1lation of <br />starm setv�rs i r� the area . Yhere i s�hzn tY�e ques L� on of the -�u ture <br />deve7 op�nen� of -�he rear porti ons of th2se � ots .. One o�F -�he tivays af <br />provic�ing for such future developmen� is �he construction of a cu7-d�- <br />sac through t�e property -in questian of-� of FulY�am S�reet. It is <br />alsa possible to deve7op the r�ar o� ti�e three deep lots (east of the <br />property in questian) by the development o-� a cul-de-sace between twa <br />of the houses fronting an County Road 8. 5ke�c�es ind�cat�d these <br />poter�tial solutions ti�rere preparec! aL the time �he properiy in question <br />rras previously praposed for division. At tha� time, no agreem�nt am��g <br />%h� nei ghbors a�as arri ved at. <br />4. It may be s�;�il �'or �h� P�anning Commiss�on �o cortsider Hrays in wi�ici� the <br />remain�ng prapert3es �a ihe eas� can be d�veloped and ho�e�ully the <br />pr�oper�y ow��ners involved co�7d work �agether to achieve this objective <br />�� they 5o desir�. <br />