1976_0913_CC_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

� Septemk�2r �, �97� PLFINNIl�JG kEPQRT CASE hU�i3ER: APPL ICAN1" : L�CR7ION: �tCTION REQUEST�D: 100�-7b Rosevi7le VFW North of L�'oodhi 11 Qri ve, East ot Griggs Di vi si on of a i_at and Vari ance to Setback PLANNIP�G COi�iSTD�RATIO�yS: 1. The property -in 9uestion is a parcel of 7and 220 feet deep with a fr�ntage of 210 feet �ahich ��ould be ir�mediaiely east of th� dedicated roadway for the exter�sian of 4vnat tivould be Dun7ap 5treet, one block east of the existing Grzggs Stree�. 2. 7he UFti�! propos2s to bui7d a new clubhouse 40 -fee� by 6I.34 feet on the property with a sea�inq capac�ty of 2Q4. The site would have a parking capac�ty of 75 cars. Large sca7e drawings of the si�e p7an anct of the prop�sed bu�7ding wi17 be available for viearing at the pub7ic hearing. The sfcetch �o the lef� is a reduced scale plan ind�cat�ng the ger�erai layout wi�h the �ro os d 1 �Y ihe VF�! C1ub. P� andscap7ng as prepared 3. The property in quAstian is zoned to �he Shopping Center Dlstric�, a zone w�ich ti�ras requested by the otivn�r o�F t�-re property �George Reilir�g) many years aga. The a�p]icant seeks ap�rovai of d CE7V75i0t1 of thz land cr�ating the parcel of 7and upor� ti,rhich the c]ub hause would be bui1� and apP�'�val of the variances to ihe set�ack from that req�ir�d -in th� S�opping Cen�er District. The setback pr�oposed wou7d be SQ feet fro� the �'ront prop�r�y line {1�0 feet required in �he Sha�ping Center pis�ric�) �vith a 17 -Foot se�back on the easterly prapprty 7ine. Tne setbacks canform to th� normal require;nents of 16 fe2t from�theistreet r� g��-of-4ray, both on l�Joodrri i] Dri ve and the proposed Du�l og S-treet and five foot of setback on the in�erior 1ot 7ines ta the north and tne east. �. 6de would suggest that the division of the prop�rty so as to crea�e a Tot o� th�se dinansions at the 1fiJfT!°diai.e corner of Dunlop and lJaodhiil -is r�asonably appropria�e. It is high7y likely that tf�e rema�nder af the iand tvi77 noi be developed iar a s�op?�ng center in the future but a� least not in its eniirety. In �he m�antime, �re feel that �he Shoppina Center Zone 4��it}� its 7arge setbacks is a reasonable zone to ca�ry on the pr�operty untii such timp as the land may he ctLve7o�ed far atner p�rposes • Conii nuance of th� Shoppi n; Center Zor�e ��ri I 1 ass i s t the Ci i.y in ultimately dc�e]opinq the land fo�, same non-resiuen�-ial tax producing p�rpose of lor�g-rang� b21�2f7[. �0 �he City.