My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-02-28_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2012
>
2012-02-28_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2012 9:02:44 AM
Creation date
2/23/2012 8:56:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/28/2012
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair DeBenedet noted inclusion in best practices of LED street light use that <br />he'd previously brought up as a future consideration and discussion for the City; <br />and the relatively short payback period indicated on this website versus his <br />original estimates; causing him to question what was delaying the City moving in <br />that direction. <br />Ms. McKeown noted the promotion of peer learning among cities rather than <br />recreating the wheel in each city; and advised that best practices had originally <br />been pulled nationwide. <br />Member Vanderwall questioned if subjective and/ <br />available through this program for participatingA <br />Ms. McKeown advised that at this point, <br />were currently working on such docu <br />practices. Ms. McKeown admitted <br />anticipated and was proving some ac <br />framing their work on the <br />Given today's budget c <br />long -term existence of <br />Ms. McKeown a, <br />term, since it <br />program wqUac <br />was more to sec <br />Commissioner'of <br />continue to efen <br />committed. <br />counties to be <br />noted that the arc <br />momentum. <br />Chair DeBenedet <br />further at a future <br />aspects that wer <br />money. <br />titative evaluations were <br />sufficient results, but they <br />case studies on older best <br />Wen off quicker than <br />vmWer agencies <br />ility and <br />V was intended to be long - <br />f person dedicated to the <br />for some time, but now it <br />)wn advised that the <br />supportive of the program and would <br />s around the table who are likewise <br />ChSen. , one on retrofitting for cities and <br />Franken's office, Ms. McKeown <br />even more visible and gather further <br />Mmber input on whether to explore this program <br />Commission meeting, opining that there were some <br />g interest to him, and would ultimately save the City <br />At the request of Member Stenlund on the cost of the program, Ms. McKeown <br />advised that there was no cost to the City. <br />Member Vanderwall noted that there would be some cost in staff time to get <br />documentation in place on best practices already in place. Member Vanderwall <br />questioned if most cities performed a preview of best practices in place prior to <br />passing the resolution. <br />Page 5 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.