My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-02-28_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2012
>
2012-02-28_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2012 9:02:44 AM
Creation date
2/23/2012 8:56:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/28/2012
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
"AND WHEREAS, organized waste collection is consistent with the 2030 <br />Comprehensive Plan, including Chapter 8, and Policy Statements 6 1, 6.3 and <br />6.4; and sustainability goals of the Plan; " <br />Member Vanderwall suggested another "WHEREAS" clause: <br />"AND WHEREAS, the present waste collection system does not provide <br />accurate information regarding uniform cost, quantity, and/or disposal sites;" <br />Considerable discussion ensued on the intent and description of Item 5, lines 49- <br />50, and the need for the data to be more planning oriented as suggested by <br />Member Vanderwall; and Member Gjerdingen su sting it be consistent with <br />previous goals to educate customers on the amo waste they produced; and <br />Member Vanderwall's preference that the co rovide for the information <br />being available to allow the community <br />Member Felice opined that better data S <br />was a venue for adequately dealing <br />addressed yet, even though that was <br />collection, to provide tha <br />make better decisions. <br />ead to better planning. <br />rn that there <br />t had not been <br />k rd organized <br />n a forthright <br />"A better <br />opined that it didn't <br />was better for the community, <br />lata ld protect all parties from complaints, <br />Felice suggested that the 2nd sentence for Item #5 <br />Oection allowing for better management for the <br />Members concurred to strike the words [... study and ... I from the RESOLVED <br />statement on page 1, line 35. Chair DeBenedet noted that the Commission and <br />trash haulers on more than one occasion had heard and been cognizant that the <br />process allowed for negotiation and should be continued to be acknowledged in <br />that statement. <br />Page 7 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.