Laserfiche WebLink
CASE ���BER: 101�• 6 � <br />October 6, 1976 Page 7Hro <br />5. Most communities take a very careful view in "down zoning" any <br />property withir� their city. Some years ago, you will recal�, tf�ere <br />was considerat�le concern by the Counc-il and Pianninc� Commission <br />aver t�e use of a con�mercially zan�d ��iece af property -�or church <br />purpases. Churcf�es are, of cours�, alloti�red in single faniily zon��s. <br />Th i s case we feel i s someti•1t�at para 11 eT i n tha�t du�l exes have beer� <br />and are being built in variaus lGCations in tn2 C�ty contic�uous <br />to and within t��e single far;�ily areas. �ram a physica� �evelap- <br />ment standpoin�C, the duplexps cauld be acc�modated on �h� �ite. <br />Oxfnr�U �o�r� ��;as or? ni ral?� �u�i 1 t�s � Nri v� t� acc�s� �fri ve tc� <br />��1� �rClrt��r?i� l. �Jt;l t'� ;�U � 4: c S J:11 � 4 d� C0i:�1 CtC� i.O Dii� ; 1 C 5 �Y'�E� <br />s�ec�fir:�t�i,�:i�. AciGquat� se�,�;er�, ��ater, and drainaqe fucili�i+�:, <br />ti,�ou1 d be avai 1�t�� e io serve the dupl e;<es as �raposed. Thi s <br />�uestion remains one primarily af long range interest t� the Ctty, <br />1-�5 tax base, and � ts ef-�i ci ent use of land al ready zoned -For ti�e <br />use originally �ntended. <br />