Laserfiche WebLink
June 2, 1976 <br />PLAh�NT��G R�P�RT <br />CASE I�Ui�'bEP: <br />AP�LICANT: <br />�OCATI0�1: <br />,�C�IO�J p�"QU�S�E:O: <br />P�A�����NG CO�yS�DE�ATTOtiS: <br />975-; v <br />llic��� 1�'i!<, 2118 t•1�d�athian Road <br />Fa s� S i de of Fu 1 fza�� Str�e� , t��Qr �h af <br />��U�"��_� '��,Q3.� �� �SE2 SE;�'iC�� <br />.�f1G('C'!3� �f' �7�c?li[:7-ii`t�sy {��.ni� <br />1. The pro�erty in c�uestiorr, as si�oti�r� o� �he sketch at the le�t, has <br />391 fez� of fronLa�e on Fu7ham SLY�O��_ and a de�th af �50.34 fee�. <br />The appl�cant pro�oses �o di�ide th� Tand into four sinyle -Family <br />l o�s l�� th 97.75 �Feet of frot}tagm eacit_ Thi s nroduces a 7 0�� area of <br />14,b54 square fee�. As you kno�rr, the minimum standard �n the <br />ord�nance is 85 feei of fron�age an:� 1�.,OQO square feet of land area <br />an interior lots of th�s kind. <br />2. The lots across the street have 1?_� �e�� of frontag� ar�d a de�th of <br />135 fe2t, or a 1ot area af �.7,435 s�;��are �eet. SQu�ral yfears ago, <br />thi s proposa I ti•ras turned down by thz Ci -�y due to o�pos i t3 on by tY�e <br />neighbars regard�ng the 7ot size. <br />3. East of the proper-ty in question, t�;�re are 7o�s of 2.3 acres u�ritn <br />about 50D �Fe�t of depth and 1b0 fieei of frantag4 of-� o-� Country E�.oad B. <br />A1� of these praperties ��vere previoG;ly affected by the preser�c� o'F <br />ponding areas ti•r'rri cn are now provi de� rar by th� i nstai lati an of <br />stor�n sew2rs i n tne area . There i s �hzn �Eje question of -�ha �uture <br />development of the rear por�ions of �hese lots. Qne gf the 4�ays af <br />pro��i di ng for such future devel opr�er� � i s the construct� or� o-� a cul -de-- <br />sac throuc�h the property in ques�iar of� af Fulham Street_ I� is <br />aiso oossible to develop the rear or the three deep iots (eas-� o-F tne <br />property in �;uestion) by thA d�v�lo�:��nt of a c�+7-de--sace bet�veen �wo <br />of the houses fronting on County Ro?� 8. S[cetci��es indicated these <br />po�er►tia7 solu�ians trere prepared a� �ne time the property in ques-��io� <br />Lvas previously proposed for divis�on. Rt that -�-im�, no agreersient amo�g <br />the neighbors ti•�as arrived at_ <br />4. T� may be w411 for �he Plar�nint� Co;;;i15S10;1 to cansider ti��ays in whicf� the <br />remaining proper�ies �o the easi can b� d2ve�op�d and hape�u�iy t.i�e <br />proper�y ot•,ners involved co�rld 4ror!c � a��ti�er to ac�ieve this objec�i�e <br />i�F the;� so desi re. <br />