My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012_0227_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2012
>
2012_0227_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2012 1:22:01 PM
Creation date
2/23/2012 2:52:24 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BRIGGS <br />B R I G G S jo <br />W2200 First National Bank Building <br />332 Minnesota Street <br />St. Paul MN 55101 -1396 <br />tel 651 .808.6600 <br />fax 651.808.6450 <br />MEMORANDUM <br />Attachment C <br />TO: Chris Miller, Finance Director for the City of Roseville, Minnesota <br />FROM: Mary L. Ippel <br />DATE: January 20, 2012 <br />RE: Post -- Issuance Compliance Policies and Procedures <br />Following issuance by the City of Roseville (the "City ") of tax - exempt governmental <br />bonds, the City must continue to take certain actions with respect to the bonds in order that they <br />retain their tax - exempt status. In particular, the City must be sure that the project financed with <br />the bonds continues to be used for public purposes and that the proceeds of the bonds are applied <br />in a manner that complies with the arbitrage rules on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as <br />amended (the "Code "), and its related regulations. <br />Over the last couple of years, the IRS has increased its scrutiny of tax - exempt bonds and <br />has strongly expressed an expectation that issuers of tax - exempt bonds have written procedures <br />in place to ensure compliance with these rules. Most recently, in September, 2011, the IRS <br />released a new Form 8038-G. which is the form that issuers file upon the issuance of each tax - <br />exempt bond issue. The new version of the form specifically asks the issuer to check a box that <br />it has established written procedures "to ensure that all nonqualified bonds of this issue are <br />remediated according to the requirements under the Code and Regulations." There is a second <br />box asking if the issuer has written procedures "to monitor the requirements of Section 148," <br />which is the Code section governing arbitrage. <br />There is no statutory or rule requirement that the City have such written procedures. By <br />including these questions on Form 8038-G (the same questions also appear on Form 8038), <br />however, the IRS is strongly emphasizing its view of the importance of having such procedures <br />in place. Informally, the IRS has also indicated that having such procedures in place may result <br />in a lower penalty in the event of any audit or voluntary compliance agreement related to an <br />issuer's bonds. Therefore, we strongly recommend that the City adopt the proposed Post - <br />Issuance Compliance Policies and Procedures. <br />The proposed Policies and Procedures have been drafted to cover the concerns and <br />expectations that have been expressed by the IRS. Yet, at the same time, we recognize that the <br />Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association <br />I Inneapolis I St. Paul I ww ,briggs.corn <br />Member - Lex Mond1, a Global Association of Independent Law Firrn5 <br />4458453v1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.