Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />ERW1N A_ PET�k230N <br />R09ERT C. BELl, <br />WI�L.AR� L. CqNV�RSE <br />F20GER A. JENSEN <br />KURT F. WAR.THER <br />W. YIMqTHY MALCH0IM <br />l�fARTIN J. GOSTELLO <br />LAW OFFICES QF <br />PETERSON, BELL & C.ONVEFtSE <br />1800 AMEFYICAN NATIONAL 9APlK BLi1LDING <br />1Q! �AST FIFTH STREST <br />ST. PAUL, N�i1NNESOTA g8101 <br />224-47b3 (B12) <br />October 22, �976 <br />Mr. James Andre <br />City Manager <br />City of Rosevill.e <br />2650 CiviG Center Drive <br />Roseville, Minnesota 55IZ3 <br />Dear Mr. AndrE: <br />.��' ����y� <br />f'� r �� <br />I <br />MiN[+[HAPO4Fg� <br />I081 800 L1N� BLIILDIPlG <br />�' E rF, <br />" 1 .. -� � r� � , i <br />��' � �' (1 �r��r-., .. <br />"� f. <br />• �.;' <br />� <br />Re: Our ii].e No. M�-8$2 <br />Korstan, Tnc., condemnati.on case <br />This is to advise you that a Ramsey County Dis�rict <br />Court jury rendered an award in. the above candemnation <br />case in the amount of $�7.,400.00, on �ctaber 2�, 1976. <br />In this case the Cammissioners award was $26,600.00. <br />At the Commissioners hearing Mr. Bettendorf appra�.sed the <br />praperty at $19,9U0.00 and no appraisa�. evidence was inade <br />by the property awners <br />In the District Caurt Mr. Bettendarf again appraised <br />the property at $19,900.00 and evidence af �he Commis�ioners <br />award of $26,600.00 was takeno The property owner p�esented <br />evidence through Mr. Eldon Robey, retz,red chiei appraiser <br />for the Min.nesota HighP,+tay Department, that the property was <br />valued at $'70,U00.�0. The property awner also presente.d <br />appraisal evidence through the tes�imony of Mr. Exnest Burra�, <br />of Niema.ec and Burrow Rea�, Estate, that i,n his opinion the <br />praperty was valued at $70,000.00. <br />The property in question was platted inta fifteen lots <br />in the �.960's. Cons�,dering the per lot value c�� plafi.ted <br />praperty in the area of Roseville where this property is <br />lacated and the testimony of Mr. Burraw who has been <br />instrttm�ntal in the developFnent of the surrounding property, <br />we are satisfi�d with the amaunt oi the award. We attribut� <br />the ].ow nature of the Commissianers award to the fact that _ <br />absolutely no appx'aisaZ evidence was presented by th� property _�F <br />owne� ta the Commissi.oners . "��`" <br />r, , ,.,. <br />�_ - },-- <br />.� .. <br />.4 -'" � I'i. <br />� 1 .. ( <br />�-^� �f � � <br />t <br />■�TY <br />