Laserfiche WebLink
�� <br />ERWIN A, PETER6�1V <br />RQSEFeT C. HELL <br />WILLARD L.CONVER$B <br />RR[3Sii A. JEPfs�N <br />KUR7 F'. WALTHIER <br />W. 7[MQTEFY MALCF±OW <br />MAAYItd J. GOSTEiLO <br />�aw oFFic�s oF <br />PETERSON, BELL & GONVERSE <br />1B00 AMSRFCAN PIATIONp1q HANK BUILDING <br />IOf EAST FIFTli S'Ci�ETc'1' <br />ST. PAUL, tvI1N[V�50TA �St01 <br />224-4703 (Bt2) <br />Nov�mber 10, I976 <br />Nir. James Andace <br />City Manager <br />City of Roseville <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Rose�ille�, Minneso�a 55i13 <br />Dear Mr. Andre: <br />i[INHtAA�LIr <br />!Q9! BOq 4IN$ BZJiLD1�IG <br />Re : On--�a'! e Liqt�ar Licenses <br />Yau have ad�srised ns that an on--sale liquor license� <br />in the City Qf Raseville has appl.xed far the renecaal of <br />��s la.cense and that as paart of its agp�.icata.on it ha� <br />indzcated that substantially Iess than. 5Qg pf �_ts c�ra,� <br />sa�.es are attr�butable �o the sale af �ood. <br />You have requested us to review the applicatian anc� <br />Section Z51.090 {11) of the City Code, which reads: <br />"At the time o� applicati.or� far renewal of <br />appl�cation of an on-sa1.e Zicen�e, the <br />applicant shall sta.bmit proaf ta the Village <br />that not less than 50� o£ the gross sales <br />of the establishment, for which the an-sale <br />�icense is ta be usedF is in the serving o� <br />food." <br />In our opinzon, that liquar license� is not e1�.gibl� <br />�or renewai of i.ts li.cense under the Gity Ordi.nance as it <br />currently.exists because it does not meet the 50% of qross <br />sa1�s require�nent. <br />By way of background, there is no Stat� statt�te requiring <br />that an on--sale liqt�or licensee prave that Fnore than 50 0 of <br />its sa�.es are from faod ra'�hex� than liquor. There �.oas such <br />� <br />