1976_0412_CC_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Case P�umb�r: 965-76 Apr� 1 7 , 1976 Page Two hold their proper�y fot� the u7timate de�e7opnpn� af offices in the fo-rm of an "�ffice park". Recen�ly, Allied S�ores taok the C-i �y to caurt cl ai mi ng non--benefi t o-E uti 1 i ti es and street con- s�ruc'tion on Flerscl�el Street. Th� judgz ruled �n favor of th� City after wh�ci� A�flied Stores appealed for a�nerded findings (a re�uest ta reduce the asse5smenis). Before hearings on t�e re��.�est for amended findings, Allied 5tores, along with the proposed developer (M and M�evelopmen� Corpora�ion) submitted �he current rezon�ng and developrr�ent requ�st fot° apprQVa� �Far a LaBel7es Stare. Tt seems ironic tha�i at �he sara tim� Allied S�ores uras dis�uting the need for Nerschp1 Street, that requ�sts wou�d be made for dev��opmen�i on questianably needing H°rschel Sireet far access and u �i 1 i ti es. On l�arch 24�h noti ce ��as recei ved tF�at Ai 1 i ed Stores is withdrawing �heir appea7 on the 6-Ierscnel Street ease_ 5. The parcel curren�ly in qtaestion is �hA 18 acre �ract bettiveen Herschei Street and Fa�irvie+�1, nor�h of Co�nty Road 8. It is propased to rezone the easterly 10 acres to B-1B af which 7 acres ti•rould be used for the construction of a 71,�40 square -�oot �aBe�les Cataiag Sho�room and 1rlarehouse. T�e v�rester�y ei ght acres woul d be rezaned from 1 i gi�t i ndustri a� to �3-1 ��h� ch i s of caurse the ori gi nal i ntendAd use -For the propzrty. The ie�ter notifying G5 of Allied Stores in�ent to drop the H�rschel Street case alsa s�ipUla'tes that ti�� 8-1 proper�y {�rresterly ei �ht acres) tiv-i 1 i nat be rezoned for any otner us� i n the fut�re. A copy o-F tha� letter is at�ached for your cansidera�ion. 6. Th� original land use plan p�-oposed and reconfirmed by th� 1909 plan re:.o�mends � iI317 t�d bUS1 E�255 uses far � th� enti r� trac � as suggested � n the earl i er backgk°o��nd com�snts . Qur pri nclpa� eflne��rn i s the es�ablishment of a re�aii �se in the area provi��ng a preceden�� for such use that may be diff�cult to restrict �n �tk�e futu;�e. You will see from later traffic count ai�alyses that thz corrtinued expansion of re-�ail facilties creates considerable problem in that ar�a. Th� applica�ts have prepared a Vre1l--desigried si�e plan far -the deve�op- ment of a LaB�lles facil-ity. I�umerous mee�i�gs have b�en h�ld ti�ith the applican�s on nu��rous elements of the pian. These incZuded parking 7ayo��, building access and orier�-�ation, access and egr�ss 7ocations, traf-F�c analyses, landscaping p�ans, drainage,�and bui i di ng €� ateri a1 s. D�tai I s of al i el emer�ts of th� p7 an ti�i 11 b� reviewed, ti��t� Iarge scale draw�ngs, at the Pianning Comm�ssion and Council hear�ngs. 7. i h� ��ac� `ud s�°LCfI sho�>�s ih� loca c i or� a� t�te i.a3�i 1�� rc�a��d development, the re�aining 8-lb three acre parcel to the soutf� of La�e11 es , and the confi gurati on ar �h� B-J. prone�~ti es on tne s;�st si de of -the site. The parking proposer� is �or 426 cars, some 36 spac.es of tt�e 46Z re�uired by the City af Rosev�l��`s parking ordinance. Due . to tF7e sign�ficant portion oT tf�e property Sy�tlCE7 is used �o� war�house p�rposes, and discussions with La6211es on ot��er site cor�d�tions, we fesl that the reduction �n parking from 462 ta �?6 is not a pr�oblem. We e,mpY�as� z� � n ti�� revi ew o t the d�si gr� propasaT s tha� more s��c° d�voted �o c�t�ass and landsca�ir�g ►�rauld be b�tter �nan areas �f as�halt no� needed for the operat�on. Accor�ingly, the apy�licani has pre�ared