Laserfiche WebLink
AGENDA SECTION : <br />������� ��� ������� ������ <br />4RIG{NA7lNG D�F�T./�iV.: <br />f��P�R��S A�I� R�C+�;•it1Et1DRTI0�tS PU�LIC :IQP,i�S <br />���rn r�o.: �z�� o�scRi��riou: CNAE•�GE ORDER r�0. 7, Pr�oj e(�f-7R-29 <br />� ROSFViLLC CITY HALL <br />.� ' �� <br />..._ �a-��: - 11/ 10/ 75 _ <br />DEPT HEAD APPROVAL. <br />C v �� <br />MGR. REVEEWED/RECOMi�A�iVDS: <br />fls cons�ructian work continued on the city hall, zt was found that poor� sub� <br />base mai�rial 8X75t�� in the mairi parking lc�t adjacei�t to �he rrew city hall. <br />Rs a resul� Qf this informa�ian, aiternatives wer� r2vie�r�d as to haw to <br />solv� t�e proh��em and the ex�ens�s invvlved in �he s�olutions. It was d�ter- <br />m� ned through conv�rsati ons �li ih thz arch� tec:is , 1"ti�i n Ci ty 7est� n� and the <br />contractors, that tl�e apprvpriat� actinr� �rould be �o �ncrease the depth of <br />asphalt to bridge over� th� materiai and ta excava�� anly tF�� c�rors'� locations. <br />Tnis co�v�rsion from th� arigin�l desigrr of 4�nches of grav�l base w�.th ?_ <br />i nches. of aspha1 t surfaci ng, ta on� of 4 2 i r�che�s of asphal t base and � 2 i nci�es <br />of wearing surface, resulted in an added co�� of �2,802.72. To insure tha� <br />ihis saTution v�ou�d ��ar°!c, th� contrac�or �=ras request�d to increase i�is guar�an� <br />tee to tti�ro years, ra�her� t��an the stancfard 1-.year° g�arantee and h� agre�d �o <br />do so. <br />7he ai ternati ve t•�ou1 d hav� been �a excavate appraxi mately 3 feet of matQr•�a7 <br />aver a 1arg� part�on of th� par�kin� 1ot and -t�i�s ai�ernate ti�ould have cost <br />approximately $2,OOOoQ� mare than the one �r1�ic� v�e �Falloy��ed. <br />Th4 avark �s identzfi�ed as Field Order iaa6 � and ca�^ri�s an add price of <br />�2,802.72. This brings tE�e total amoun� of �hange order approved to date <br />to $19,529.14a <br />R�C�'°1P:1Ei•�DED ACTIO�"�: <br />� <br />t�ppravai of Chan�� �r°der IJa o 7 far the r_i ty hal l i denti fi ed <br />as Field Order Pdo. 5 in the amount of �2,802.72. This <br />projec4 carries the i d�nti fi�a�i or� o-� t��74�-29 0 • <br />�'i�e Manag�r� i s fu�°t�er i nstrucied �a noti f,y the archi tect <br />that sai d approval d�es not wai ve an�� cl.air� that th� ci t� <br />may have agains� said archi�ec�t. <br />