My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1975_0818_CC_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1975
>
1975_0818_CC_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 1:55:37 PM
Creation date
2/29/2012 2:31:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AGENDA SECTION: <br />Reports � Reco�nendatians <br />M��T��vG H-�H-7S <br />REQUE�T F�R C4��1CIL ��Tl��! °ATE: -�-----� <br />QRkGINATtNG DEPT,/DIV_: <br />�tdm <br />�--v� {VO.: ITEM DESCR1PTiON��chard Schu.lze request for variance to sign <br />�` �� se�hack a� 21Q9 North Snelling Avenue <br />DEPT. HEAD AR <br />/ RECOhiMENDS : <br />The Planning Commission at its Ju1y 2, meeting advised I�. Schulze (Sotmd. of N�szc) <br />that they were xeluctan� to approve the varian.ce �o setbaCk as he requested. The <br />Corrunissxan sugges�ed io the applicant �hat he ask the Co1or Ti�e Company if h� couJ.� <br />place his propased sign on the existing Color Tile py�on sign. The applicant agreed <br />ta this suggestzan and the Co�tission continued the hearang to the nex�t meetin.g. <br />�lt the August 6, Planning Conunission meeting Mr. Schulze repoxted that �he Co�or <br />Ti1e Company had agreed to pern�it the Sound of M�zsic s�gn to be placed on their <br />existing pylon sign. Because of this the variance to setback is no 3.anger required. <br />However, Mr. Schu3.ze iadicated that he thought a vari.ance to sign height and/or <br />size may be necessary. Because ___ fihe hearing notice con�ained. ox�y a reques� £or <br />variance to sign setback, the Plannixzg Commission could not cansider any heig�xt or <br />size variances at this- time. <br />The Planning Co�nnission then reco�end�d approval af Mr. Schulze's request to with- <br />draw his application for variance ia sign setback at 2I09 Snell�ng Aven.u� and further <br />reco�ended that the $50 application fee be reimbursed. <br />It was the Planning Commission�s feeling that since �th�e�� had suggested the Ap�Iican-t <br />a�tempt to place the sign on the existing pylon that t e fee should be reimbursec�. <br />Under normal circvmstances, because the cost of ma.iling the notices has already been <br />incuxrea, the fee would n.ot be reimbursed. However, because of the somewhat unusual <br />circ�nstan�c�s surroi.u�.ding the recEuest, the Co�ci1 may desire to award �the reimbuxse- <br />ment. <br />The applicant has been advised tha� if he �inds that a'variance is needed to sign <br />height, and/ax size � that he �nr�.s�make a new applica.tion for the varzance. <br />Council Action Requested: Motion appraving the request of Mr. Richaxd Schulze <br />to withdraw the application for variance �o sign <br />setback ai 2�D9 Nor�.h Snelling Avenue (and if �he <br />Coimcil so decides, to reimburse the $50 application <br />fee) . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.