1975_0922_CC_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

AGENDA SECI'iON: R�nor�s and Reco�nenda�zons IETEM NO.: ITEM DESCRIPTION' E-3 MEETIIVG g�Z2-%S ��U�ST �Ld� 4OU{V�I� �7� 1 �� DATE: ORIGIlVATING DE?T./DIV.: Adm 1976 Praposed Budget dEPT.HEAD APPROVAL. MGf2. REa(IEWED/RECOMMENDS: On September 8, the ].97b prop�sed budge�C was offzcia3�ly presented to the Council. A detailed review of the budget dacument was cond.ucted by ihe Cauncil on 5eptember 9. The proposed budget was agend�.zed £or the September I5,Gouncil meeting for further discussian. It �s again sr.heduled for additional co�nents and aiscussion. The Cotmcil may wish to consi.der the budget for fina� adaption ox contznue its consideration to October 6. The resolution certifying the tax �evy is required to be subm�tted to the County Aziditor by October 10. One budget ztem that was unresolved as the resul� of the detailed xevxew session related to the police central co�uaunication sys�em. The pxopos�d appropriation was for $64,00�. Subsequent disc�zssions with �he County�s Communica�ion Consultant (�Varc� Montgamery) on the �EAA gran�, inc�icates that the City could ins�all a central cammunica�Cian system with the capability for 24-hour dispatch at an est�ma.�.ed cost af $15,OQ0 ta $20,Q00. There would be an advantage zn designing �he centxaJ. uni.t concurrently wi�h the pa�rtable and mobile specifications. 'I1iis appxoach doss not require the City to make a decision at thzs tame on 24-hour dispatching. The staff will be submi�tizlg a proposal �or a con- sultant to design, pxepare specifications and evaluate bids for a central co�n�ica'tipns uni�. The cost of such consu].tant services t�rould �e approximate�y $2,000. Specific details of �he proposa�. will �e submitted at the October 6, Gouncil meeting. Therefore, the 1976 b�zage� will be xeduced by �44,0�0 ($64,U00 to $20,OOQ) to reflec-� the above change. This wi11 not reduce the t.ax Ievy because the central co�nLmications t�nit was proposed to be financea by the Police Relief Fund... The proposed bu.dge� now ca11s for expend.itures totalling $7,790,353 or $70�,922 o�rer the I975 budgei. This represen�s a 9.90 zncreas� over fhe current year. `The single largest increase {$295,0�0) is for the installation of a�5" water trimk main and represents 4.20 0£ �he toia� expendzture increase. This expendit�re {water main) is �a be financed from water opera�ing revenues. The tax levy necessary to finance the prapased.budget is �1,759,423 or a$23,317 increase over 1975. This represents a 1.34o increase over �he current year. General Revenue Sharing �unds are not included in the proposed budge�. Action Requested; i�4otion continuing consideration a£ the 1976 proposed buciget to the meeting o� October 6, 1975, or �� , � I��otian approving a resolution adopting the annua.l budget for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 1976 and ending Decembe� 31, 1976 and ��,�,�,/ �'� A4otion approving a resalutian certifying th� t�x levy to the Caunty "d�- Aud�tor fox co�.lectian dux�xn.g 1976 for purpos�s of operata.ng the City o� Roseville, and �� D_� Motion approving a resolut�on directing the Cotm�ty Auditor to reduce the estabiished tax levy for golf course bonds, �,aater improvement bon.ds, sanitary set,rer improvement bonds, general improvement bonds, ice arena. bands, park bonds and City Eia21 bancis.