1975_1006_CC_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

� September 3, 1975 PLANNING REP�RT CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCA7ION: ACTION REQUES7ED: PL.AiV[�ING CONSIDE�ATTONS: � 9i 9--75 Lewis J. �ohnson � 2965 North Snel 1 i ng Aven�ae, Rosev� 11 e, NEI� South af Lydia Avenue, ldest of the Pau7 Sunyan Motel Rezoning fram R-1 to R-2 1. As shown on the sEcetch at the left, the properties in ques�ion are seven single family lots fron�ing an a cui-de-sac {Russell Court) off of Lydia "Avenue behind the Pau� Bunyan P�lotel property. 7he applicant o�vns the seven lots in ques�ion and is o� co�rse, the owner and opera�or of the Paul Bunyan Motel cor�tiguous an the east. The applican� does not own l.ot A� at the sauthwest end of the cul-de-sac. 2. The applican� propases duplexes on these se�en constructed a number o� are off of County Road center). We unders�and p�ctures of the propose to have Micnel's Construc�ion Company build seven lots in question. The Miehel's peopie have duplexes in the City, the most recent of which C--2, west o� t-lami i ne Avenue {north of ihe shoppi ng that the Michel's people wi�l present drawings and d duplexes ta be built at the public hear�ng. 3. The City of Rosevi7le's zoning code provides for �ransitionaZ uses in same cases con'�iguous to business�zanes. The Ordinance allows for the construction of a dup�ex in a single family zone�if the sing�e family lot.has a side yard contiguous to the business zone. This candi�ion would be true far Lots 1 and 4 of the Russell Court Subdivisian. 4. The n�ighborhood to the south and west on 5tanbr�dqe Avenue, Ni�ll�rood Avenue, etc., is composed of excellent single family hous�ng. Co�nty D-itch Number 4 as you will note an the slcetch separates the rear �at Zine of �he praperties in question from the contiguous neighborhood to the southwest. The lots a�ang the ti�res� side of Russell Court in quest�on are nigh averlooking ihe di�cn along the rear of �he properties. Care 4rould have �o be taken during construction to ensure controi of erosion. Likewise upon comple�ion of consiruc-�ian adequate planting would be helpful in main�aining these banks. 5. The Camprehensive Plan of 1969 suggested the easterly side of Russeil Court be deve1 aped as an EXtE�i51011 of the corr�merci al al ong Ss�el l i ng Avenue . The westerly five lots Urere suggested for "mixed deve7opmen�", normaliy construed to be townhoEise development or sim�lar. ihe soutnernmost lot not owned by the applicant (Lot 4) is occupied by a single family home built abo�t ten years ago.