1975_1006_CC_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

October 1 , 1975 PLANiVING REPORT GASE NUMS�R: APPLICAI�T: LOCATION: AC�'ION REQlJES7ED: PLAIVNING CONSIDERATIO�[S: 92b-75 Ray Kroiss . East of Cleve7and Avenue, Souih of Wilder Street {see sketch) A�provai of Preliminary Plat and Rezoning fr�r� R-3A to R-2 � 1. You wi17 recall that Mr. Kroiss recently platted the property " immediately narth of the property in que5tion into nine single family lots (White Oak Hills). At �hat time the remaining property to the south (the property in qU�5�1011� was applisd �or rezoning from R-3A (mu7tiple -Fa�i1y) to I-1 (light industrial). This request was turned down by the City due principally to the poteniial encroachmen� of industriai zoning on this and contiguous properties, and problems of access to fuiure contiguo�s properiies. 2. At this time r9r. Kroiss proposes to develop the subjeci property with duplexes rather than as apartments as currently zoned. For this purpose, the applicant has fiied_a preliminary plat which cansists of twelve {12} lots front�ng on proposed Brenner Avenue as shown on the sketch at the left. The applicant would have preferred to develop the praperty with a simple cul-de-sac, but f�as agreed to extend tE�e street to the easterly property lir�e so as to provide future a�cess.to the property to the east as sugqested by -ihe C�ty staff. 3. You will note an th which would affer a eas� ta the subject c�rculation sysiem ta Caunty Road D. e sketch the projection of a street in dotted lines means of tying the residential properties to the property in a manner which provides and efficient for residential deve1opinent from Cleveland Avenue 4. You wil� note too, that there are two Iong narrow pieces of pro�erty immediately east of the property in question, each with a width of 275 feet (frontage on County Road D). A contract purchaser o-F the easterlX praperty of these twa has indicat�d a desire to develap the land for single family purposes. The street as shown on the sketch in the dotted lines wauld accomplish ihis tying in to the praperty in quest�an (Brenner Avenue}. lde have also revieti�ed this proposa� with the owner of the westerly property through which Brenner v�rould pass near the south end. We hav� indicated to it�ese owners (the Schulze Family} the �nanner in which this proposed extension of residential streets would open u� their property �or single family development at such time as they propose to do so. Lde have sugc�ested that representatives of the Schulze family be at the Planning Commission meeting to express their views on th�s proposal.