My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1975_0331_CC_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1975
>
1975_0331_CC_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 11:55:04 AM
Creation date
2/29/2012 3:53:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�� ���� ���i ����4�r��. ������`�i <br />lav�tai7ll s�iTl�iiV: <br />REP��RTS AiJ� RECO.'•�.F'�i�QATIO}JS <br />4i�9� i'i0. <br />��_,7 <br />t��s ��cs��o�� <br />wFi?C+JPdLtii`I�3% SS�pT_�{?E�.: <br />Pl!�LIC 1�i0�€�S <br />DAL� STRE�T STQ� "i SEl�f�R P,EVIE;�i, t�iflP,TFi 0� CJL��dTY R0,'�D C <br />I3AIt.. J/ J1/ /:Jr .- <br />G�EPT_ t�fAJ A�'�PGbAL. <br />�. �` ff <br />�a�. �-v��yve�f �ce���� : <br />L�st y�ar, t�e occu;�ants of i he B�n Con ta��rnhause deve�opr�ent, east of �aT� <br />S�ree� at�d nortl� of Coun�_y �oad C, became concern4d ov�r L��+}�at the�a f�ared <br />4rer� �nade�uacies �n -�he s�orm setver syster� serving vheir developm�nt. <br />They, therefore, requesteci that �h� r�a�ter be i�ves�iga�ed �y ti�e city and <br />i.hat a re�ort be �rzsented b�cfc to tfi� Cour�eil far conszd�ra�ion. The <br />consultir�g fir€� of Bahister, Short, Ell�ott, H�ndrickson an� l�ssociates, <br />was clee�ed to be 6est ab1Q to provi�e t��e ex�ertise on �his ma�ter, as t�ey <br />were very fa�i 1 i ar a1i th �h i s condi ti an ,�avi ng �revi ousi y t�orked on i t be- <br />fore. <br />They have naj�a co���et�d thei r r�p�rt and i t i s reael;� for r�v� ew b_y the <br />Counci �. Thei r basi c-Fi ndi ng i s ti-�a�, �riii le tne d«el l i ngs may hav� been <br />canstructed at a grade t�iat is �ower than desira6le, the storm se��er syster� <br />in c�en�rai neets t!/piGal c;ty stanc�ards. Onl�� one s�ctian of tha stor�m sei�er <br />systam is oth�r �han typical in design and tnis does not const�tu�e a seve�^e <br />probiem by itself. � <br />It �vouid seem that while higher standards of storm se���er design could be un- <br />dertaken, that �t is not the Cit�r o-F Rosevill�'s standard approach ta tha <br />prob7em an� �nat sucn act�an, if desired bv the residents, should be tota�iy <br />assqssed against �hen ta recover t�e expe�cliiure o-� funds. In an.v eveni, <br />�fth�r witl� thA existing storr� urater systQm or 4vitn so�e aT�er4d s��st�r� v�nic� <br />might be constructed, i�e occJ�ants shauld take snec�iai c�re to �nsur� that <br />�1�L i nl �t faci 7 i ti es Z oca��d i��t�e rear .yard areas t�rhi c� i ead to ih� �ubl i c <br />sewers , ar� clear from debri s and fre� -Fi ak�i na. <br />R�c4rnriended action; If the c�uncil cor�curs with thQ stud��, th�n <br />no council action is necessary. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.