My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1975_0512_CC_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1975
>
1975_0512_CC_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 12:15:27 PM
Creation date
3/1/2012 11:03:39 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTI�N <br />AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT./DIV.: <br />REPQRTS & RECOP�i�iEE�JpATIOPJS PUBLIC irlORI.S <br />M NO.: ITEM DESCRIPTION' <br />�� �� GHIt�JG£ ORD�� idd. 1, Pro.ject M-75-4, flIL TANiC REL�CI�TI�?�! <br />�aTE: 5/ l. 2/ 75 <br />DEPT.HEAD APPROVAL. <br />�✓ U [`� <br />MGR. REVIEWED/ RECOMMENDS : <br />On hlarch 31, 1975, the city final�zed the cantract with �finneso�a <br />Limited, Incorporated, far ti�e ir�sta�lation of a neVa 15,000 ga7lon <br />oil tank and relocation of existing facilities. The tank bid, �s <br />pro�osed, was an I1' x 21' tank which was to be relocated just <br />inside the fe�ce� in area on the north end of the �arage. <br />Ti�e esthetics of the fac9lity and its visual im�act are a ma,jor <br />concern b�cause of its�c]ose proximity to 6�foodhiil Drive and its <br />exposure to the resid�n�ia1 property to the norihwest. Provisions <br />were, therefore, made for reducing the he�gh� of the tank to 10 feet <br />by �xtendi ng i ts 1 ength vrhi ch ��voul d gi ve a 1 o���er sz i houette and <br />cause less tank ta be exposed over the top of the fence. Secause o� <br />the extenszon to 26 fee�, howev�r, added costs are reqiaired for the <br />construction, plus having longer heating coils to heat the oil This <br />resu7ts in a cast increase of $600.00 to the approximately �14,OQ0.00 <br />contract. As you probab7y recalI, this pro,�ect was more ti�an �70Q0.00 <br />under our engineer's estimate and so this increase �s still well within <br />our expected cast. <br />RECOMMEIdDEp COElA�CIL ACTIO�d: Approval of Chanc�e Order �Jo. 1 of <br />Prvject 1�-75-4 in the amount ot <br />�6Q0.00. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.