My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-01-24_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
2012-01-24_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2012 12:48:27 PM
Creation date
3/1/2012 12:48:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/24/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair DeBenedet suggested landscaping features be included in future public <br /> meetings and determine their interest in development of a landscape plan for <br /> future consideration. <br /> Member Stenlund noted that the next round of design developments could provide <br /> the County with credits for some landscaping amenities <br /> Member Vanderwall noted that, while the displayed maps were difficult to read, <br /> the packet materials provided more clarity. <br /> 8. Discuss the City's Current Assessment Policies for Non-Residential <br /> Properties <br /> Mr. Schwartz advised that previous discussions led into the City's current <br /> Assessment Policies for non-residential properties, Sections #2 and 3. <br /> Chair DeBenedet noted his confusion with Item 1 of the Special Assessment <br /> Policy related to temporary public roadway upgrades. <br /> Mr. Schwartz noted that this policy is dated; and some previous issues raised by <br /> the PWET Commission were the basis for further discussion and potential <br /> revisions to the existing policy. <br /> Discussion included increasing costs for signals at intersection; right-of-way <br /> acquisition costs; cost-share of major projects with Ramsey County and MnDOT <br /> with or without federal funding or the availability of State Aid funds; advantages <br /> in the retail and business community participation in the City's tax base versus <br /> additional infrastructure costs; and examples of other metropolitan suburb <br /> assessment policies (e.g. Maplewood Mall and White Bear Avenue <br /> reconstruction); and participation of watershed districts. <br /> By consensus, the Commission determined that this item would be discussed <br /> further at a future meeting. <br /> 9. Possible Items for Next Meeting—February 28, 2012 <br /> • Parks and Recreation Commission—previous Pathways Master Plan and <br /> Parks Master Plan Discussion <br /> • Discuss the City's Current Assessment Policies for Non-Residential Properties <br /> 10. Adjourn <br /> Member Vanderwall moved, Member Stenlund seconded, adjournment of the <br /> meeting at approximately 8:47 p.m. <br /> Ayes: 5 <br /> Nays: 0 <br /> Motion carried. <br /> Page 10 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.