My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-01-24_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
2012-01-24_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2012 12:48:27 PM
Creation date
3/1/2012 12:48:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/24/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair DeBenedet noted inclusion in best practices of LED street light use that <br /> he'd previously brought up as a future consideration and discussion for the City; <br /> and the relatively short payback period indicated on this website versus his <br /> original estimates; causing him to question what was delaying the City moving in <br /> that direction. <br /> Ms. McKeown noted the promotion of peer learning among cities rather than <br /> recreating the wheel in each city; and advised that best practices had originally <br /> been pulled nationwide. <br /> Member Vanderwall questioned if subjective and/or quantitative evaluations were <br /> available through this program for participating cities. <br /> Ms. McKeown advised that at this point, there were not sufficient results, but they <br /> were currently working on such documentation through case studies on older best <br /> practices. Ms. McKeown admitted that the program had taken off quicker than <br /> anticipated and was proving somewhat overwhelming, with other agencies <br /> framing their work on the GreenStep Cities model. <br /> Given today's budget climate, Member Vanderwall questioned the viability and <br /> long-term existence of this program. <br /> Ms. McKeown assured Commissioners that the program was intended to be long- <br /> term, since it was run by the MPCA, and has had one staff person dedicated to the <br /> program who had been working on similar programs for some time, but now it <br /> was more focused and made more sense. Ms. McKeown advised that the <br /> Commissioner of the MPCA was strongly supportive of the program and would <br /> continue to defend it, as well as the partners around the table who are likewise <br /> committed. Through upcoming workshops, one on retrofitting for cities and <br /> counties to be held at the U of MN through Sen. Franken's office, Ms. McKeown <br /> noted that the program would become even more visible and gather further <br /> momentum. <br /> Chair DeBenedet sought Member input on whether to explore this program <br /> further at a future PWET Commission meeting, opining that there were some <br /> aspects that were of strong interest to him, and would ultimately save the City <br /> money. <br /> At the request of Member Stenlund on the cost of the program, Ms. McKeown <br /> advised that there was no cost to the City. <br /> Member Vanderwall noted that there would be some cost in staff time to get <br /> documentation in place on best practices already in place. Member Vanderwall <br /> questioned if most cities performed a preview of best practices in place prior to <br /> passing the resolution. <br /> Page 5 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.